Way back in October 2019 I wrote a post about CNN (Chicken Noodle News) in HongKong and got this comment from Ms. LOL@NO.COM
My ABSOLUTE TRUE REPLY was :
And I’m still getting these kind of BS GTFouttaHere comments to this day.
We went to Hong Kong to visit our office there. FACT.
I WAS the 49% owner and director of a multi/international UK Ltd (fully registered at Companies House – paying 70% Corporation Tax) Security Company along with my 51% husband.
YouTube HATES truth. True Truth.
YouTube IS Disney Fantasy Land where anyone can do, be, say anything that they want.
Greta Brookes was KILLED by youtube TRUTHERS.
And not a single ET TU BRUTI gives a flying fuck.
Shame on y’all.
We were given the chance to unite and fight against THE THEY. Some just fought against their own. Blue on Blue.
Sad but TRUE.
For once in my life I’ve got something to say I want to say it now for now is today A love has been given so why not enjoy So let’s all grab and let’s all enjoy If the kids are united then we’ll never be divided If the kids are united then we’ll never be divided Just take a look around you What do you see
I’ve done this before but today it is VERY apposite.
A WHISTLEBLOWER = MASS HATRED INCOMING.
I’ve blown so many whistles these past few years and have been given MASS HATRED.
I mean. C’mon. Just how many peeps are far too scared of the truth? And why?
The WHY? is easy. True Truth completely exposes their lies and deceptions and fakery and that is uncomfortable. To be faced with your own shitty actions.
Don’t get me wrong. I’m so far from perfect. I’ve effed up many a time but……..I’ll always take the punishment.
What I will NEVER take is the false, foney, fakery of others who place their blame on me and – wilfully and with malice aforethought – spend years destroying MY life. MY reputation. MY work. MY honesty. MY everything.
The quote above belongs to ME now. As in, I’ve come to fully own it through experience.
And I WILL stand by it.
To be hated for what we ARE is so much better than the lie. In my opinion.
Something that I’ve never talked about fully is being psychic, or whatever label you want to call it. I prefer the old label – SEER.
Clairsentience is real.
It is also a road to hell when you blurt out unwanted truths…like me. All the time. Ooops.
Growing up with other family members who denied their “real” because they were too afraid to step away from Societal Norms might’ve made me swing the pendulum a bit too far the other way.
When you are having a wonderful conversation with someone and you suddenly, innocently blurt out – How many Children Have You Had? Things start to get very tricky. Very fast. That’s how I know about her appalling childhood.
It opened a wound deeply buried yet still raw and bleeding at the time.
She’s all but healed from it now that it’s no longer a dark secret. TRUTH.
I’d rather be hated or avoided than FAKE LOVED. Thank you :o)
I started at 6am and I’ve just gone back to the beginning of my formulating hypothesis, theory, doobery whatnot.
I’m NOT up on the Shakespeare Sonnets. A part of his works that I’ve neglected for a long time. But I was sent back to them at stupid o’clock this morning. Also to something that I’d read a couple of days ago…see quote below :
Please note that all researchers of the “Shakespearean question”, including I.M.Gililov, are absolutely convinced of the stability and correctness of the general picture of the events of the 16th-17th centuries, drawn to us today by Scaligerian textbooks. They think that the mysteries surrounding the identity of the Great Bard concern only him, and are built into the generally reliable history of the 16th and 17th centuries. But they do not understand that in reality the entire historical building of the 16th-17th centuries is very shaky and needs to be substantially rebuilt. Moreover, starting from the foundation! For example, for Shakespeare scholars, trained in Scaligerian history from childhood, the identity of Queen Elizabeth does not raise any doubts. There was, they say, such a real famous queen on the island of England. But after all, we already understand that the “English Elizabeth” is, basically, a phantom reflection of the Russian-Horde queen Sophia Paleolog. And that a significant part of the “English island events” actually unfolded in a completely different place – in the metropolis of the Great Empire, in Russia-Horde. The same should be said, for example, about Henry VIII, see chapter 5. And about Catherine of Aragon. And about Mary Stuart…
As we have shown in this book,
Shakespeare’s works are even more important and interesting than is commonly believed.
That is, their high assessment adopted today should be strengthened. After all, many of his texts turn out to be not just plays on “very ancient themes”, but in fact – chronicles of the formation and development of the Great = “Mongolian” Empire. For example, the poet talks about Andronicus-Christ (calling him Hamlet), Judas Iscariot (Timon of Athens), the Virgin Mary, John the Baptist, King Herod (Macbeth), Queen Herodias, Sophia Paleologus (Cordelia and Catherine of Aragon), Ivan the Terrible (Henry VIII ), stories of Esther (Anne Boleyn)… Shakespeare scholars did not even suspect this, since the true essence of some of the poet’s fundamental works was distorted by later layers.
They have a point, NC. We are all so conditioned to fit our theories around the “SOLIDITY” of the History that we’ve been taught.
Did the likes of Scaliger know, when he was first commissioned to rewrite HIS- story, that he was creating a HYDRA that would grow a million heads throughout the decades and centuries without him?
Was that the plan?
To fiddle with the compass bearings and just sit back and watch the chaos of their descendants’ travels?
I so badly want to debunk the theory that Rutland and Elizabeth Sidney were the man we call Shakespeare but… I have so much more work to do :o)
Meanwhile – whomever wrote the words – here is something beautiful.