A Savoyard History Blip

Don’t you love it when every route you take takes you back to where you’ve once been and sheds a little more light?

I do.

Recent posts here have talked about The Rusalka – Slavic mermaids, Vladimir Propp, my novel, N.C. etc etc.

On December the 31st 2019 I wrote this : The Many Hidden Mysteries of Tartaria.

A part of which contained –

Well, right now, all I have is many, many questions and many many subjects that I’m linking together. And all that I can give you, at this moment in time is a list of my mixed up knowledge and the way it is slowly (but ever so brightly) linking together.

Not a lot of this will make sense right now. These are just clues. Signposts.

But, PLEASE bear with me over the coming months as I gather in more information.

Right. Let’s take a look at the first Very Rough Guide to  —

The Greta Brookes, Hidden History Project, Guide to Grand Tartaria. 

****

To this day I am still linking stuff together.

We’ll start with a Weave a Garland of My Vows basic research fact. The marriages of the children of Henri IV Bourbon and Marie de Medici.

Louis XIII married the Spanish Anne of Austria, sister of Felipe IV of Spain.

Elizabeth married Felipe IV of Spain , brother of Anne of Austria.

Gaston married the Montpensier – richest woman in France

Henriette Marie married Charles I Stuart of England

Christine married Victor Amadeus I – DUC OF SAVOY.

Savoy is familiar to all as the resting place of the Turin Shroud. Which (according to New Chronology) could have originated in Constantinople and was rescued by the original owners who took it north during the Sack of Constantinople in 1204.

The image above is of a 17th century Savoyard suit of armour housed in the Royal Palace in Turin.

Another picture of the same armour :

Victor Amadeus I and his Savoyard troops took part in the 30 Years War, in Eastern Europe.

So why were his troops wearing armour not only decorated with the Slavic/Eastern European amulet of the Mermaid/Ruskala but also the Crescent Moon of the Ottoman?

We’ve been taught that the 30 Years War was a fight between Western European Catholics and Protestants.

:o)

Ichthys and Melusine

In my crazy head these two make perfect sense.

Ichthys (the fish) is the sign of Jesus. Melusine is half female half fish.

This legend is so old. It connects with Lorraine in France.

Lorraine connects with a virgin…Jehanne.

Jehanne connects with Rene d’Anjou.

Rene connects with Nicolas Flamel.

I could go on forever but NC connects Melusine/Sirens/Kelpies/Rusalka/The Little Mermaid with Mary – Mother of Christ.

Half woman/half ichthys (?)

If y’all actually believe in humans who live under the sea then…God help y’all.

This video is not as effed up as I want it to be.

Egypt IS important here. So are the Romany/Romani/Romean as seen in the earlier post.

But wtf do I know?

I’m just a hoosewife :o)

P.S. The image above is deliberate. Finding Nemo.

NEMO means either Nobody OR The Man.

Chew on that one !

Rusalka

I had no idea just how deep this went. Until yesterday.

The Rusalk(a)i. Mermaids. Myth and Folk-lore. A MASSIVE horizon of connections that spans the whole world.

It’s the Divine Feminine being manipulated via FAKE history. It’s also the Virgin Mother.

I’ll start with a cartoon and end with N.C. And Vladimir Propp/Maria Tatar. Sometime soon :o)

Think Siren, Mermaid, Selkie, Baba Yaga, Mother Earth….SNAKE!

The Spear of Destiny vs The Spear of Longinus

I’ve spent too long doing this stuff. Just to have it all ripped apart by the “We Always Win” crew.

Nah. Not any more, mes braves.

Go back. Go way, way back to my posts from 2018/2019 when I tear the Romans apart. Especially Julius Caesar and all that crap.

HIS – story is real. It’s all HIS Story. When you dive deep into Fomenko and New Chronology and actually try to debunk them for over a decade. You’ll understand from whence I come.

Who drove a Spear into Christ’s side when he was on the cross?

And WHO one was of the killers of Julius Caesar?

Et tu Bruti?

Et tu Gaius Cassius Longinus?

And none of this has anything to do with Russia – the country as we know it today.

AEWAR has fallen down the same hole, methinks.

And yes. I’m overly sensitive right now. That’s the lot of a REAL EMPATH who FEELS every single knife/arrow/spear on their soul.

Apparently Herr A. Hitler was desperate to obtain the Spear of Destiny so that he could have magical power uber alles. And we all know how that ended. Follow a MYTH, disprove a myth.

NC postulates that the man known as Julius Caesar is a “reflection” of the myth known as “Jesus.”

I’m in my own private Circle of Hell chez Dante right now.

Or just keep on taking the piss out of me.

So over y’all :o)

P.S. Try looking into Wagner and Parsifal or Wolfram von Eschenbach’s Parzival or The Bleeding Spear of the Grail Castle or The Fisher King with his thigh stuck by a spear or Chiron the wounded or ? ? ?

The Strangest of Strange Spanish Connections

Throughout my life it has been said that somewhere in the deep dark past, my mother’s family had Spanish blood. Hence the dark eyes and dark hair that we both share.

I was stunned when my DNA didn’t bring up a single sniff of a Spanish gene. So I dismissed this as family mis-information.

But…..

OMG.

Via New Chronology, I ended up HERE : La història usurpadahttps://historiausurpada.blogspot.com/2020/05/the-catalans-of-gaul-expanded-to-the-british-isles-the-catuvellauni.html

My maternal family have been in Norfolk for centuries. We KNOW this via my second cousin Janet who did the whole family ancestry thing in church/parish/family/public records.

Why the excitement?

Ha. Twofold excitement.

I know a little about the History of my country. Even Roman History.

The ancient Catalans or Catalauni were one of the founding peoples of Gaul. However, in this article we will find that they were also from the British Isles. The supposed British tribe of the Catuvellauni or Catuvellans, is actually a branch of the people of the Catalauni or Catalans of Gaul that split due to the arrival of the people of the Belgians in their territory, in the area of the current Champagne (former Catalan or Catalaunian Plains).

The Catuvellauni were a Norfolk Tribe of “Ancient Brits”

Then we have the link with Norfolk and an ongoing obsession of mine (if you’ve been with me from the start, you’ll know this)

The Mabinogi.

Who’d’ve thunk, hey ?

:o)

Obliterated History

There are so many examples.

I’ve spent a week going over the Obliteration of History via the word aka literature. But this subject is too deep and subject-ive. It’s so full of potential pit-holes and lack of evidence by me – because I have no access to any of the primary sources.

An easier (but still potentially contentious) route is via archaeology. But that can smack into the lack of written evidence too.

When a hump a manmade bump?

Did y’all know that it can take up to a year for a modern grave to settle? We live right by a cemetery and have talked to the grave diggers. At the end of the funeral day, there is a huge hump of soil over the coffin. Worms and weather do their thing for a full 4 seasons and the mound levels out.

Anyhoo.

Russia lost thousands and thousands and thousands of burial mounds in the 19th century. And bones. And grave-goods.

****

THE FALSIFICATION OF HISTORY IN THE XVII-XVIII CC.

&& THE ROMANOV ARCHAEOLOGISTS-POGROMISTS.

In [1v], ch.1:13.1 and [TsRIM], ch.9 we tell about the excavations in Central Russia conducted by the Romanov archaeologists of the XIX century. In particular in 1851-1854 count A.S.Uvarov, who today is mistakenly called an archaeologist, in the land of Vladimir and Suzdal excavated 7729 mounds. SEVEN THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED AND TWENTY NINE! It is reported: ‘On entering the items to the Rumyantsevsky museum (re: the excavations of 1851-1854 – Author) they presented all in all a CHAOTIC PILE OF STUFF, as there was no accompanying inventory notes specifying which mound each item originated from. Mr.Uvarov AT A LATER DATE compiled an inventory of the entire collection, however using just the excavation reports and PARTIALLY BY MEMORY. The grandiose excavations of 1851-1854 in the Suzdal region WILL BE GREATLY MOURNED BY SCIENCE FOR A LONG TIME and will serve as a dreadful premonition for all the enthusiasts of MASS EXCAVATIONS. So much sadder is the LOSS OF THE VLADIMIR MOUNDS in that they present the ONLY material to answer the question about which Russian tribe in particular laid the foundation of the Velikorossy (The Great Russians – in the Pre-Soviet time the Russians were officially called Velikorossy (Great Russia), the Ukranians – Malorossy (Little Russia), the Belorussian were called the same name as today the Belorussian (White Russia) – Translator’s note) … THE LOSS OF THESE MOUNDS CANNOT BE COMPENSATED BY ANYTHING’ [305:0], p.89-90.

There were some days, when UP TO 80 OR MORE MOUNDS WERE OPENED UP. That was not the scientific research, but a deliberate demolition. Our analysis allows us to state the following:

# Count A.S.Uvarov and P.S.Saveliev over a period of at least four years in the middle of the XIX century organised and headed a deliberate destruction of the old Russian-Horde mounds in Central Russia, authorized by the Imperial Edict. I.e. at the very heart of the former ‘Mongol Empire’.

# The Russian-Horde mounds were mercilessly razed to the ground and the burials inside them were destroyed there and then. Hundreds of workers were summoned for the purpose. There was no trace of any ‘scientific research’ there.

# Almost no detailed documents reporting on this pogrom survive. They ‘disappeared’ mysteriously. A few of them which are presented to us today were written post factum.

# A small amount of unearthed items were preserved for the museums. So there was something to demonstrate and to give an account for. Purporting, that these were the results of their meticulous scientific activities. Alleging, that they have found something nonetheless, though really not a lot. Most of the genuine findings which could tell us a lot about our history, were destroyed straight away in the field. Or hidden in the deep storages.

Today we cannot even imagine how many mounds turned out to exist in Russia. THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS were destroyed by the Romanovs administrators. Nevertheless in the XIX century there was still a lot left. For example, ‘Mr.Nefyodov who opened up one mound in the same area and reporting that he counted up to 200 mounds over the distance of 3 versts (0.6629 mile – Tr.)’ [305:0], p.93. But soon they got to them too. Needless to say they were all ruthlessly razed to the ground.

Only vague rumours reached out time and recollections of some numerous mounds along Tver downstream of Volga, the mounds of Uglich, the mounds of Murom, etc. [305:0], p.94-95. Where are they now? They are gone. No trace of them. Not afield, not in the documents. Where are the findings unearthed from them?

CONCLUSION. In the second half of the XIX century the Romanov administrators, archaeologists and historians destroyed many thousands of the Russian-Horde burial mounds. Most likely they were razed to the ground deliberately in order to conceal the traces of the true history of the XIII-XVI cc. Today we are being cynically told with a wry smile: you see, there are no mounds and opulent burials in Russia, our history is poor, doesn’t come close to the history of the West, the East, the North or the South.

The Alaska Purchase

HISTORY.

1867.

WHY?

Where is the Bering Strait? Who was Bering?

MSHist vs AltHist.

Above, we talked about the striking at first glance statement of the British Encyclopedia of 1771, that almost all of Siberia was formed at that time, that is, at the end of the 18th century! – an independent state with its capital in Tobolsk. And it WAS THE BIGGEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD. In the 18th century, the Siberian state – “Moscow Tartary” – began in the west from the middle reaches of the Volga, approximately from Nizhny Novgorod and stretched east to the China Sea. The capital of this state in the 18th century was the city of Tobolsk, whose name on many maps of that time sounds like TOBOL, see above…..

Let us now take a closer look at how North America was depicted on European maps of the 18th century before Pugachev, that is, the war of 1773-1775. It turns out that western North America is generally NOT SHOWN AT ALL on European maps. The European cartographers of that time JUST DID NOT KNOW what it looked like.

KALMYK

Love it when everything converges to ZERO POINT.

I’ve been sitting on this one for years but – as no-one actually reads what I write. I’ll just push forwards and totally ignore the youtube TARTARIA trooth community who insist on concentrating all eyes towards buildings and away from people.

WHO BUILT THESE BUILDINGS?

People?

Who are the Kalmyks and why are they in America?

Disclaimer : I am NOT responsible for google translations from Russian to English.

AND –
Calmouc is the same as Kalmyk.

:o)

After the defeat of Pugachev, the Romanovs launched a furious persecution of his supporters. Among which, as is well known, were the Kalmyks. But the Kalmyks were not the main core of Pugachev’s troops. On the side of Pugachev, a significant part of the Russian Cossacks acted. After the defeat of Pugachev, the Volga Cossack army was completely destroyed, the capital of which was in the Trekhostrovskaya village on the lower Volga (now the village of Samoilovka, Saratov Region). The Yaik Cossack army was severely defeated. The Volga Cossacks and Kalmyks were partly destroyed, partly deported to the south on the line from Mozdok from Azov in 1777, see [36], article “Cossacks”. The picture of the destruction of the Russian Cossacks on the Volga after the defeat of Pugachev is well outlined, for example, in the historical studies of D.L. Mordovtsev [17]. Very likely, that part of the Cossacks – and in general the Pugachev troops – fled to the east. Naturally, they tried to run TO THEIR OWN. And indeed, JUST AT THIS TIME WE SEE MIGRATION FROM THE VOLGA TO MANZHUR CHINA.

Which indicates that the manchurs were OWN for the VOLGA, YAITSK AND SIBERIAN COSSACKS, AND ALSO FOR THE KALMYKS. By the way, the Kalmyks who lived in the Don region in Russia until 1917 were in the rank of Cossacks [36], article “Kalmyks”.

****

Like a Dog With a Bone

Yup. That’s me. since 2019 I’ve been trying to figure Napoleon out.

As in – WTF did he know?

From my decades of N.C. research I have begun to understand the importance of “Egypt” and “Russia” and “Rome.”

Nappy was a major force in Egypt (the First Rome), he wanted to take Constantinople (the Second Rome) but he targeted Moscow (the third Rome)

WHY?

What was he fighting for?

He went into Egypt just a few years after the defeat of the last Tartar Khan (Pugachev) WHY?

He by-passed Constantinople and made moves on Moscow.

Probably, Napoleon hoped that the forces of the defeated Moscow Tartaria still exist. And if they are given military assistance, they will be able to rise up and overthrow the Petersburg government. It is clear that if he had succeeded in this plan, Napoleon would have received a reliable ally in the person of a renewed Russia. With whom he could easily conquer the rest of the world. This, apparently, was his calculation. No wonder, before the capture of Moscow, he, as you know, waited a long time on Poklonnaya Hill for the MOSCOW BOYARS with the keys to Moscow. That is, I thought that the boyars in Moscow still exist. Historians laugh at this behavior of Napoleon. Say, he did not know that there were no boyars in Russia for almost a hundred years, since the time of Peter. But in fact, Napoleon was not so naive. He KNEW that the boyars were in Moscow quite recently. He was probably waiting for the keys to Moscow BOYAR MOSCOW TARTARY. Napoleon, apparently, simply could not imagine with what monstrous cruelty the Romanovs, having captured Siberia, exterminated everyone there – the boyars, the governor and, to a large extent, the ordinary population. By the time of Napoleon, none of those who were able to resist were no longer left in Moscow Tartaria.

That was 1812. In 1815 he had another enemy to overcome. BRITAIN.

Waterloo.

We (Brits in Wellington Boots) beat him and ended up with an Empire…..AN EMPIRE.

In my humble opinion, EMPEROR Napoleon Bonaparte was on a mission to become the next Khan of Tartary – aka – enjoy WORLD DOMINATION.

Silly sod :o)

Plato to Plotinus to Plet(h)on

Plato – long ago in the B.C.

Plotinus – long ago in the early A.D.

Gemistos Plethon – late 14th/early 15th c A.D.

Will the REAL PLATO please stand up?

The mysterious Epoch of the “Renaissance” in the Scaligerian chronology

In the Scaligerian chronology, the “effect of rebirth” is clearly expressed, supposedly “repetition of antiquity”. Ancient Plato is considered the founder of “Platonism”. Then his teaching dies, to be reborn a few hundred years later in another famous “Neoplatonist” Plotinus, allegedly 205-270 AD. The name of which “accidentally” turned out to be practically identical with the name of his spiritual teacher Plato. Then Neoplatonism also dies, so that after another few hundred years, but this time already in the 15th century AD, it will be reborn again with the same strength in another famous “Platonist” – Pleton. The name of which is again “accidentally” almost identical with the name of the ancient teacher Plato. It is believed that the medieval Gemist Pleton “revived” ancient Platonism and was a fierce propagandist”

Gemist Pleton organizes in Florence the “Pletonic Academy” – the exact analogue of the “ancient” Platonic Academy [247]. A.A.Vasiliev wrote: “His (Pleton – Auth.) stay in Florence … one of the most important moments in the history of the transplantation of ancient Greek science in Italy, and especially the emergence of Platonic philosophy in the West” [657], v.3, h .2; [120].

Both the “ancient” Plato and the medieval Pleton write “utopias”. It is reported that Gemist Pleton is the author of the famous utopia Treatise on Laws, which, unfortunately, has not come down to us in its entirety. But on the other hand, the full text of the treatise on the “Laws” of the supposedly ancient Plato has come down to us. Like the “ancient” Plato, the medieval Pleton of the 15th century puts forward the idea of ​​an ideal state. Moreover, his program is extremely close to the program of the “ancient” Plato. “Imitating” both of them, Plotinus, who allegedly lived in 205-270 AD, also hopes that the emperor will help him found the city of Platonopolis in Campania (and again in Italy), in which he will introduce aristocratic-communal institutions “according to Plato “[122], v.4, p.394-397.

****

Way back in the early 2000’s when I first came across Fomenko and New Chronology, I was so disgusted by the whole thing that I made it my mission to debunk the entire dung heap.

Over 20 years of study later and….

…the only thing that I have debunked is MY indoctrinated ideas about History.

As each year passes, I have found too much evidence for New Chronology. Too little against it.

Oh. Here’s a mainstream history view of Gemistos Plet(h)on – the Neo, NEO-Platonist. Who (coincidently) was born in Constantinople.

Four Hundred Years of Deception

Maybe it’s because I’ve studied this for so very long. Maybe it’s because I’m a “know-it-all.”

Maybe I’m just a bit simple.

BUT – The quote below makes sense of so many things for me. ESPECIALLY the whole cowboys and Indians narrative.

AND – even a hundred years ago when I did MY school history classes, we were told that Russia sold Alaska to the US for a pittance.

This is NOT Mystery History. this is commonsense enabling a person to connect a few dots.

Shrug.

Can’t y’all see how the new alt-historians have further confused everything? The War of Independence … from my point of view…

The British Isles were very closely connected to Tartary. Especially Scotland. When the Americans fought for their Independence, it was NOT against Britain. It was against the Empire that could never be remembered. To the US – this FIGHT against a pissy little island was so much easier to fake than the REAL fight against a power that had once controlled/invaded/settled/advanced/grown over three quarters of our known world.

And this constant fake fight between America and Romanov Russia is a total blinder. Romanov Russia MADE America. They shared the Spoils of War in 1776.

****

Let’s go back to the question of when and how the USA was established. ‘During the War of independence of North America in 1775-17983… an independent state – the USA was formed’ [797], p.1232. And here we realise, that it SURPRISINGLY COINCIDES WITH THE END OF THE WAR WITH ‘PUGACHEV’ IN RUSSIA. ‘Pugachev’ was crushed in 1775. Everything falls into place. ‘The War of independence’ in North America was the struggle with the weakening Russian Horde. The Romanovs attacked the Horde from the West. And from the East in America – it was attacked by the Americans ‘fighting for independence’. Today we are told that the Americans purportedly fought for their ‘independence from Britain’. In fact it was a battle for the parcelling of the vast American land of Moscow Tartary left without any central administration. In order not to miss the carve-up, the American troops were eager to get to the West and North-West. George Washington became the first president of the USA in 1776 [796], p.1232. It appears that he became the first new ruler in the American lands of the Russian Horde. The facts of the war with the ‘Mongol’ Horde were wiped clean from the pages of the textbooks on the American history. As was the fact of the existence of Moscow Tartaria on the whole. The war between the USA and the remains of the Horde continued up until the second half of the XIX century. Alaska, which remained Russian for a particularly long time, was ‘bought’ from the Romanovs by the Americans only in 1867 [797], p.1232.

Bewildered Sadness

Finding myself still totally banned from a revered yt truther channel has left me…sadly bewildered. 3 years on? I must be either totally disgusting or nowhere near good enough.

Anyhoo.

I left a comment this morning on an overnight video about Crimea.

Crimea has been a centuries long sticking point between powers because of it’s strategic position.

tI was vital to both the Byzantine empire and the Ukraine. All I commented was – 1613 the Romanov come to power. 1775 the last Tartar Khan is murdered. And still they are fighting over there.

Shrug.

****

Moscow Tartary spanned the Urals, Siberia, Central Asia, The Far East, Alaska and North America. The conflict between Moscow Tartary and Romanov Russia (originally small in size) ended in the second half of the XVIII century with the famous, allegedly ‘peasant’, war against ‘Pugachev’. The Romanovs succeeded in agreeing peace separately with Turkey and defeating the Great Tartary. Only after this the European emigrants who had settled on the Atlantic seaboard of North America, ventured West, inland over the continent. For decades they seized the North-American territories of Moscow Tartary left without any governmental authority. Today this has been beautifully, but incorrectly narrated on in the Hollywood movies about ‘the very noble’ white frontiersmen and the ‘very bad’ Indians.

As a result, in 1776 (straight after the defeat of ‘Pugachev’) the United States of America emerged. With the Romanovs they voraciously and speedily sliced and diced the vast territories of Moscow Tartary. Ural, Siberia, the Far East. In America – Alaska and Oregon was ceded to the Romanovs. The rest of North America – to the USA. After failing to maintain these bountiful lands, distant from St.Petersburg, and unwilling to obey the usurpers, both Oregon and Alaska were given away to the USA for a notably paltry sum. The very fact of the existence of Moscow Tartary up to the end of the XVIII century and the division of its vast territories between the conquerors was wiped clean from the history textbooks – both in the Old and the New Worlds. Up until now the native Russian population of America is being persistently forced to forget their language and their past.

****

Pugachev was (allegedly) a scarecrow, peasant who rebelled against his betters and deserved his execution in January 1775.

The Last Tartar Khan was beheaded and then drawn and quartered. Oooh. The Romanov did NOT like him, eh?

A Short History of the Comneni

John the Good and his brother Isaac were very close.

Isaac married Kata/Irene and they had three children Andronicus, John, Anna.

My very old family tree above used the Mainstream history dates for the birth and death of Andronicus I Comnenus but….the video below blows the birth date outta the wazoo.

According to N.C. Andronicus Comnenus was born in 1152 and crucified in 1185.

A bit of maths here? C’mon.

Today is my eldest son’s 33rd birthday. Which PROVES Venus Rose’s description of me as a dinosaur. I’m over 50 years old.

Aaaaarrrrgggghhhhhhhhh! Hateful.

:o)

Loving my haters more and more :o)

The Alexiad of Anna Comnena

Reading this played a huge part in my research for Ravens of Dinefwr.

Why?

Because Robert Curthouse, the older brother of Henry, and Duke of Normandy went on the very First Crusade in 1096 and one of my major fictional characters had gone with him.

I just needed a good background about travelling half way across the world on horseback to fight the peeps who supposedly killed Christ about 1,000 years earlier.

Or so they say!

N.C.’s new book starts with….

Chapter 1.

Anna Komnena in her famous “Alexiad”, it turns out, twice tells about the largest religious event of the XII century – the new dogma of Andronicus-Christ. The commentators of the “Alexiad” did not notice this, since Anna calls Christ here either Vasily Bogomil, or John Ital

1. Anna Komnena – a famous Byzantine author allegedly of the XII century. She wrote the fundamental work “Alexiad” about the life of her father, Emperor Alexei I Komnenos.

2. But “Alexiad” by Anna Komnina has come down to us in the later processing of the editors of the XVI-XVII centuries

3. Two famous and large-scale religious “heresies” of Vasily Bogomil (Cathars) and John Ital in the history of Europe and Byzantium in the 11th and 12th centuries are reflections of the teachings of Andronicus-Christ, that is, Prince Andrei Bogolyubsky from the 12th century.

INTRIGUED< I AM :O)

Mirages of Europe : New N.C. Book

Yay. I’ve been waiting for this new book from New Chronology.

Hopefully it’ll be available in English soon.

The authors have processed important blocks in the history of Europe and Byzantium in the 11th-17th centuries. The famous Byzantine figures – Vasily Bogomil and John Ital – turn out to be vivid reflections of the emperor Andronicus-Christ, that is, Prince Andrei Bogolyubsky from the 12th century. For example, the famous gospel story is clarified: why two “thieves” were crucified next to Christ on Golgotha. It turns out that the Prudent Thief symbolizes the disciples of Christ, who continued to honor Him after the judgment. And the Mad Thief is the image of the disciples who refused Christ. Records of the trial of Christ discovered. The story of the famous Jeanne d’Arc and the French King Charles VI is a phantom reflection of the biographies of Empress Elena Voloshanka (Esther) and Tsar Ivan the Terrible (Artaxerxes). The biographies of the English kings Henry VI and Richard III (including those in Shakespeare’s tragedies) are based on the “Roman biographies” of Khan Ivan the Terrible and Khan Boris Godunov. The famous English war of the Scarlet and White Roses is a western reflection of the war of the Oprichnina and the Zemshchina in Russia-Horde in the second half of the 16th century.

I’ve posted about Andronicus & Charles VI & Jehanne d’Arc & Henry IV and & Richard III & Shakespeare & Elena & The Wars of the Roses soooooo many times. And also the Bogomils via the Cathars.

Now is the winter of our discontent made glorious summer by this sun of York.

Oooh. I did that off the top of my head. All this Shakespeare stuff is sticking to my little brain cell – LOL.

I’ll leave the possible shape of our world and NelsonMadelaEffect and the never-ending cry of ALL HISTORY IS A LIE to the masses of masses who are “woke.”

!

Robin Hood : Prince of Thieves

I LOVE this film for many reasons, both personal and historical.

Personal – We were living in Gibraltar when it first came on the TV. My boys were tiny and funny and totalling maddening!

Historical – Just look at the image above and deny ME this part of my work over the last 4 years. Which hand are they going to cut off?

I could link so many previous posts to make my point but – m’eh – who cares.

According to N.C. Robin Hood is just a reflection of Christ and/or Andronicus I Comnenus.

The Turin Shroud conceals the fact that… whomever it is an image of…the right hand has been severed. Like Andronicus. Like the bloody handprints of Muhammed. Or the Red Hand of Ulster. Or the right hands carved into the Templar Church at Garway. Did y’all notice that in the Garway Templar Church post t’other day?

This film also features the “MOOR” Azeem. The Saracan. The Enemy.

BUT BEST OF ALL (for me at least) is Alan Rickman’s Sheriff of Nottingham.

And WHY the flying fluff are Robin Hood and his Merry Men so deeply associated with Lincoln Green?

Lincoln green is the colour of dyed woollen cloth formerly originating in LincolnEngland, a major cloth town during the high Middle Ages. The dyers of Lincoln, known for colouring wool with woad (Isatis tinctoria) to give it a strong blue shade,[2] created the eponymous Lincoln green by overdyeing this blue wool with yellow weld (Reseda luteola)[3] or dyers’ broom, Genista tinctoria.[4] Other colours like “Coventry blue” and “Kendal green” were linked to the dyers of different English towns.[5]

Lincoln green is often associated with Robin Hood and his Merry Men in Sherwood ForestNottinghamshire

Who Knows who knows?

P.S. Andronicus I Comnenus had several members of his extended family executed when he became Emperor. He hated that they had grown so rich by taking from the poor. So he reversed that and GAVE to the poor whenever he could.

They took their revenge by cutting off his right hand and having him crucified. Look it up…in the NOT Mainstream Sources.

Too Complicated To Talk about in One Post.

42 – or Thoughty2 has just released a video about the Knight’s Templar. And as I’m currently listening to Fabric of Sin by Phil Rickman, which deals with the Templar Church at Garway, Herefordshire – I’m being taken back 3/4 years to previous posts on a previous blog that Greta Brookes began in 2018.

For a long time AMP has been a guiding hand in my research.

BTW : the last time I mentioned him here I got a like from a person PRETENDING to be AMP. TRUE TRUTH & #Disgusting.

AMP article quote which touches on the Templars but this bit is relevant to ME.

Playing with myth and fiction, the past has been built and in turn dressed and partially erased from history, its link to real events. But the real story is written parabolically, in a very long chronology. The main axes can be deciphered and, in part, demonstrated, for three reasons. One, because there has never been an intention to hide it. Two, because there is evidence of its manipulation. And three, because it has been transcribed, despite censorship, the way to rewrite it. The New Chronology of Fomenko and Nosovskiy lay the foundation for this reconstruction, while its variant, known as the X-185 Chronology, has just shaped it. As their names point, there is another chronological map on which to understand another story, very different from the official one.

According to both works, the construction of the story in a long time context begins in the sixteenth century, accelerates in the seventeenth and has its peak in the eighteenth, being the nineteenth and twentieth centuries when it is completed with “monumental” contents for its quantity, detail and extension. And everything that happened until the nineteenth century should be called into question, in the same way as all dating methods, including Carbon-14, which is considered infallible but is not. All its methodology is based on calibration tables that consider valid the existence of samples that fit a chronological map that is not questioned. And this leads to numerous errors.

****

See? Complications that require too much research and brain-work. Unless y’all just skim the surface and make a video.

Year of the TIGER. Meow. Slash. Claw.

Mainstream View of the Livonian War

I know. I’ve done the Livonian War several times but I based those posts on my research into N.C.

It’s enlightening to see the mainstream view of this “little” war.

The date to keep in mind is 1613 – the date that the Romanov seized control of the “Empire.”

Peter the Great I Romanov married a servant girl who became Catherine I of Russia. I know very little about her, most people do. A later Catherine (the GREAT) takes all of centre stage.

Enjoy :o)

Away With the Fairies aka A Gigantic History Hatchet Job

For 1 : You will find very little information about Andronicus I Comnenus.

For 2 : What you do find – will be via Niketas Choniates and his editors who DESPISED the man.

I’ve posted this one before. Long ago. But few were interested!

My own sources came via the NOT Mainstream peeps but from people who had access to much more than I ever could. One of them even guided me through my own journey into this family with subtle clues and the odd elbow poke when I’d gone off course. Bless him :o)

I have nothing against this girl. She’s Scottish (!) and she has done a brilliant job of presenting the “official” history.

BTW : Comnenus means Horse.

And “The They” decided to have fun with the rewrite and place him on a donkey……..(?1?)

Which Library Is Which?

I have done this before but it’s still too bizarre from many.

The Pharos. The Library of Alexandria. One of the 7 Wonders etc.

What is it really?

I know what N.C. think…

The Lost Library of Grozny III=IV is a well-known story in Russian history. We have repeatedly spoken about this library, for example, in the book “Seven Wonders of the World”, ch.3:1. Briefly, the essence of the matter is this. Under Ivan III=IV, a huge and valuable library was created, containing ancient books, manuscripts, papyrus scrolls and, in general, documents of world history. She was, of course, in the metropolis of the Empire, that is, in Vladimir-Suzdal Russia. But then she “disappeared”. It is still not known for certain what happened to her. According to one version, she was hidden in “underground Moscow”. Recall that even today, under modern Moscow, the remains of a huge underground city are still preserved. This building has been shrouded in myths and legends for several centuries. Consists of numerous underground corridors, galleries, rooms, vast halls, storehouses, wells, stairs, passages, hiding places, collapsed chambers, immured doors, flooded passages. Some scientists believe that the famous book depository of Ivan the Terrible is hidden somewhere here. The history of underground Moscow and its research is described in an interesting book by I.Ya. Stelletsky “Searching for the Library of Ivan the Terrible” [815:1].

I now have a secondary source for research.

IK-PTZ – for the full article.

Meanwhile :

The network of Kremlin dungeons, striking in its size, is rooted in the history of the reign of the ancient family of princes of Rurikovich, and in particular of the sovereign of all Russia Ivan the Terrible. The network of tunnels, with which the king dug almost the entire city, was kept in the strictest secrecy, and still keeps many secrets, beautiful and terrible. It was through them that eminent residents of the Kremlin palaces could get to anywhere in the city, as well as beyond. It was there that creepy dungeons were set up, not inferior to the dungeons of medieval European castles. And it was in them that the royal treasuries were located. The inhabitants of the Moscow undergrounds, who guarded the innumerable palace riches, lived and died in their dungeons, without seeing sunlight for decades and taking great secrets with them to their graves.

In addition to gold reserves, the Kremlin dungeons, apparently, store another, no less valuable, treasure – the world-famous library of Ivan the Terrible, containing several thousand folios and scrolls that previously belonged to the Byzantine emperors, as well as the Grand Duke of Kiev Yaroslav the Wise. Experts from far abroad came to see them. The library disappeared without a trace 15 years after the death of the autocrat, and there are suggestions that it was safely hidden by Grozny himself. One day, a group of diggers found the entrance to the Kremlin’s underground chamber filled with chests that looked like ancient descriptions of precious books, but the entrance was too narrow and the subsequent collapse completely closed it.

But even Tsar Ivan the Terrible never dreamed of the extent to which the construction of underground passages in Moscow would expand in the 20th century. 

The Man from La Mancha/or Moscow

I’ve gone as far as I need to go in my AltHist journey into Don Quixote for the moment.

It’s a story that I’ve covered a few times before… my fave time was via Shakespeare’s play Henry VIII.

This can be found on my previous blog – July 2018 – August 2021

I re-watched Lindsay’s video on the same story yesterday just to cement a few of my own findings.

As a MS History video – I find her very informative.

No antsypantsy vibe on my side. Fact!

I’m just a housewife & blogger :o)

The Thirty Years War

In my totally NOT Mainstream History Way – I wrote an article way back in 2019 about The Hidden History of the Cathars

I named it – Part 1. There was never a Part 2 because it got hijacked and used by something else. Old news.

****

CATHARS,  FOMENKO/NOSOVSKIY,  NEW CHRONOLOGY,  RESEARCH,  TARTARY,  THE HIDDEN HISTORY PROJECT

The Hidden History of the Cathars – Part One

Monday, 18 March 2019, 11:00

The Hidden History of the Cathars

By

Greta Brookes

This article is based partly on the New Chronology[1]and also my own extensive research into 17th Europe.

It will examine:

  • The “official histories” of the Cathars and the Albigensian Crusade of the 13th century,
  • What exactly was happening in Europe in the 17th
  • The connections between both of these eras and events.

The Cathars and the Albigensian Crusade.

We have been told that the Cathars (Cathari) were a Christian religious sect based mainly in the south of France during the 12th and 13th centuries and that their heretical practises were so offensive to the Church of Rome and all other good citizens of Europe that they had to be exterminated in a Christian Crusade. Their heresy was dualism. The belief that two principles lie at the root of everything – Good and Evil.

July 1209 – Arnaud Amalric: “Kill them all. God will know his own.”

The four main Cathar dioceses in Southern France were Agen, Albi, Carcassonne and Toulouse and the main castles were at Carcassonne, Montsegur, Queribus, Puylaurens, Roquefixade, Peyrepertuse, Termes and Puivert. This whole area of France is known as the Languedoc or Roussillon

Peyrepertuse

Roquefixade

If you don’t know about the Cathars and the Albigensian Crusades there are mega-tons of information out there but for a quick “official” starter there is WikiWhatever.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albigensian_Crusade

Main Cathar Strongholds in the Languedoc

Europe in the 17th Century

From the end of the 16th century and rolling deep into the 17th, the history of Europe is full of turmoil. The Reformation, Continent-wide Wars, Civil Wars, massacres, regicide, executions. For example:

  • St Bartholomew’s Day Massacre, Paris – 1572
  • Murder of Henri IV, King of France, Paris – 1610
  • The Time of Troubles, Russia and establishment of Romanov rule – 1613
  • Start of the Thirty Years War, Europe – 1618 or before
  • The Defenestration of Prague – 1618
  • Richelieu unites Catholic France with the Protestant Swedes thereby bringing France into the Thirty Years War – 1629
  • Henri II, Duc de Montmorency executed, France – 1632
  • The Wars of Three Kingdoms – England, Scotland, Ireland begins – 1639
  • The Fronde Civil Wars in France begin – 1648
  • King Charles I of England executed – 1649
  • Ottoman war against Hapsburg Hungary – 1663
  • Second Anglo-Dutch War – 1665
  • Russian-Turkish Wars begin -1676

The complete list is very long. Here is just a fraction of the timeline to show the general climate of Europe at this time.

What does any of this 17th Century stuff have to do with the Cathars?

If you are familiar with New Chronology (NC) you will know that, for the past 40 years plus, a team of Russian mathematicians have been doing in depth investigations into the hiding, editing and re-arranging of the history that we have all been taught.

I will explain no more about their work here other than to say that it consists of many thousands of pages and is worth investigating.

Okay. That said, NC research suggests that the annihilation of the Cathars did not take place in the 13th century as we have been told. It actually happened in the 17th century.

From a personal point of view, this makes sense. I have spent many years steeped in 17th century Europe in order to write a fictional account of the life and times of Marie de Rohan, and I may have completely rejected the NC version of Cathar history if not for Henri II, Duc de Montmorency, a close friend of Marie’s. I have put him in the timeline above for reasons that will become clear later.

What is the Hidden History of the Cathars?

It is interesting to note that “Cathar” is a name imposed by outsiders on this religious group. They only ever called themselves “Christians” or “Good Christians.” Bons chrétiens.

It is equally interesting to know that the Cathars of Northern France and elsewhere were called Bulgares. That is, Slavs from the Volga Region.

Locations of Cathars in Europe

As the map above shows, Cathars were not confined to the Languedoc in the South of France but they were spread across the continent of Europe and also Africa and America amongst many other lands. It is not inconceivable, therefore, that the true origins of the Bons chrétiens, is linked with the Horde/Great/Tartarian Empire (also known as Scythians) which expanded across most of the world during the 13th to 15th centuries. This can be amply illustrated by looking at their crosses and their flags.

Cathar Crosses

 Cathar Cross

Celtic Cross in Ireland

Christ with a Cathar Cross behind

It is not widely known but the Cathar flag consisted of equal width, repeating, vertical yellow and red stripes.

Drawing of the monument at the mountain where Montsegur Fortress stands ruined

The inscriptions say – in Occtian

“Als Catar als martyrs del pur créstian”

“To the Cathars, to the martyrs of pure Christian love”

And in French –

“L’héritique n’est pas celui que brûle le bucher mais celui qui l’allume.”

“A heretic is not the one who burns at the stake but the one who lights it.”

And beneath the monument is a Cathar flag made of yellow and red flowers.

This symbol of the old religion is not just confined to the Languedoc or Roussillon, it’s other name.

Aragon (1582-1624)

Arms of Catalonia (listing Valencia, Naples, Sicily, Jerusalem, Sardinia, Navarre, Aragon)

Italy  (1640)

Sicily (1635)

Dalmatia (1640)

Belgium (bottom right…with the double-headed eagle of the Horde/Empire)

PART TWO WILL FOLLOW SHORTLY (i.e. When I’ve put it all together) :o)

[1] The Development of America by The  Russian-Horde:  G.V.Nosovskiy, A.T.Fomenko V6 Book2 Chapter

****

The major part of this article/post for ME is the following :

From the end of the 16th century and rolling deep into the 17th, the history of Europe is full of turmoil. The Reformation, Continent-wide Wars, Civil Wars, massacres, regicide, executions. For example:

  • St Bartholomew’s Day Massacre, Paris – 1572
  • Murder of Henri IV, King of France, Paris – 1610
  • The Time of Troubles, Russia and establishment of Romanov rule – 1613
  • Start of the Thirty Years War, Europe – 1618 or before
  • The Defenestration of Prague – 1618
  • Richelieu unites Catholic France with the Protestant Swedes thereby bringing France into the Thirty Years War – 1629
  • Henri II, Duc de Montmorency executed, France – 1632
  • The Wars of Three Kingdoms – England, Scotland, Ireland begins – 1639
  • The Fronde Civil Wars in France begin – 1648
  • King Charles I of England executed – 1649
  • Ottoman war against Hapsburg Hungary – 1663
  • Second Anglo-Dutch War – 1665
  • Russian-Turkish Wars begin -1676

****

I’d written this long before I researched the LIVONIAN WAR. Fact/God’s Honest/NO LIE.

Ergo : The Livonian War WAS the 30 Years War…the Reformation. The fight to free the wannabes from the TARTARIAN/HORDE Empire.

Or was it?

You can play VR games or do the REAL research.

Your choice :o)

Don Quixote/Livonian War

I’ve not forgotten the Man who tilted at windmills. I’m just going back over my own work.

There are a few posts on this subject, all linked to another subject that I was deep reading at the time.

Example…

14th of June 2019

Livonian War (?)

Friday, 14 June 2019, 4:10

Before I can get to Elisabeth Bathory, I have to understand the Oprichnina.

Before I get to the Oprichnina, I have to understand the Livonian War.

What’s the Livonian War?

Not what we’ve been told.

No, shit!!!

WikiSilly Page – Livonian War

Now – what really happened?

:o)

****

But this was the post about The Livonian War.

Heads up : The most important clueage is the DATE! Don Quixote, published 1602 or 1605.

LIVONIAN WAR,  NEW CHRONOLOGY,  RESEARCH,  TARTARY,  TREBIZOND

The Real Livonian War

Friday, 14 June 2019, 6:44

The Livonian War can also be called the Revolt of Western Europe against the Empire. It coincides perfectly with the Reformation, that time in history (16th/early 17th cc) when everything begins to change.

In W. Europe, “Lutheranism” was  chosen as a banner for reform and rebellion. But to the Empire, Lutheranism was exactly the same as the Heresy of the Judaizers, as embodied by the story of Elena of Moldavia.

Please see previous posts about Shakepseare’s play Henry VIII.

Ivan the Terrible chose Elena and the new ‘religion’ over Zoe and the old Empire.

Destruction of Zoë Palaiologina’s grave – Kremlin, Moscow 1929

Who was behind the new ‘religion’? The Romanov. They started it. They pushed it. They wanted to crush the Empire once and for all. And then they rewrote the history books.

But, meanwhile, having defeated the rebels in Kazan, the Empire continued to fight back. A punitive force marched West to begin the Livonian War. A series battles for survival.

Where exactly in Europe was Livonia? Simple. At this time, the entire land mass of Europe was called Livonia. It was not a small Slavic enclave to the East of the continent as portrayed today. Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and …Sweden

It was the Mother of all Wars.

To the Empire, at their centre of power in Veliky Novgorod, the “Reformation in Livonia” was the rebellion of dependant territories against their rightful rulers.  But, as the rulers engaged in their fight back, the Oprichnina began in Moscow.

“In 1564 the oprichnina was established. “The boyar V.M. YURIEV-ZAHARYIN became one of the main initiators of the oprichnina and it was the Zakharyins around whom the RULING CIRCLE OF THE OPRICHNINA had grouped. “

“The first wave of persecutions targeted primarily the princely clans of Russia, notably the influential families of Suzdal’. Ivan executed, exiled, or tortured prominent members of the boyar clans on questionable accusations of conspiracy. 1566 saw the oprichnina extended to eight central districts. Of the 12,000 nobles there, 570 became oprichniks, and the rest were expelled. They had to make their way to the zemschina in mid-winter; peasants who helped them were executed.”

The Wiki page Livonian War  

…gives details of many of the battles.

But it fails to mention the true causes. 

……..

To Be Continued :o)

.TARTAREMVINXIREGIM.PATRESQREDEMCAPTIVOS.

Has she FINALLY gone round the bend and down the pipe?

From DAY 1 I’ve said that Tartaria was something truly special. And it should NEVER be used as an excuse to gain fame & fortune.

FACT!

Let’s unravel the .TARTAREMVINXIREGIM.PATRESQREDEMCAPTIVOS. via N.C.

This has to do with depiction found in a painting done in the 15th century. A seal on a tomb. And a memory of times past.

****

At the same time, the beginning of the inscription TARTAREMVINXIREGIM is placed in the picture above, occupies the upper half of the circle, and therefore is clearly the beginning of the text. Further, in the first line, the letters MVIN (after TARTARE) are slightly obscured, but they are quite readable. The left vertical stick of the M at the end of the word TARTAREM rests on the base of the previous E. The left oblique stick of the M and its second vertical right stick are clearly visible. Immediately behind it is the letter V, the left stick of which touches the right vertical stick of the letter M.

Second line (inner circle): .SVRGO.MORSQVIGILQIAGEI. or .SVRGO.MORSO.VIGILO.IAGEI. . Deal in is that “tails.” standing next to two letters O mean here, probably, not the Latin letter Q, but a separating sign between adjacent words, something like a dash.

So the first line says:

TARTAREM – Tatar, Tartar.

VINXI is a well-known form of the Latin word VINCIO = to tie around, tie, enchant, fasten, hold.

REGIM (regimen) – management, ruler, board, command.

PATRES (patrice) – master, patrician (patricius), paternal (patrie). See also padre, pater = father.

QREDEM (credem) – I believe, creed, “creed”. Recall that the Latin C is also read as K, and therefore it could be depicted in this inscription with the letter Q.

CAPTIVOS (captivus) – a prisoner taken prisoner, a prisoner of war, captured.

The second line says the following (the word break in the middle of the inscription is ours):

.SVRGO.MORSO.VIGILO.IAGEI.

SVRGO may be a corruption of the Latin SARGO or SARGUS meaning “fish”.

MORSO = to tear, bite, sting, torment.

VIGIL or VIGILO = awake, vigilant, sentry, watchman, night guard.

IAGET may be a slight corruption of the Latin AGET from AGO = to agitate, drive, move, excite, disturb, disturb, torment, annoy, cast off.

See also Latin-Russian Dictionary [237].

The meaning of both inscriptions is quite clear. The first line says something like this: Tartar. Connected. Ruler. Father. I believe (probably the one I believe in, the Creed). Captured.

Second line: Fish. To torment. Night guard. Brought into excitement.

Let’s just say that both lines perfectly correspond to the essence of the matter. The meaning of the first line is this: Christ, the emperor-ruler, the Father in whom Christians believe, was captured by Roman soldiers and Jewish high priests, the Pharisees.

The presence of the term TARTAR here is striking. It categorically does not fit into the Scaligerian version of history, but it is in perfect agreement with the New Chronology. According to our results, Andronicus-Christ, aka Grand Duke Andrei Bogolyubsky, was the ruler of Russia-Horde, which at that time was also called TARTARIA. As we can see, in the XV-XVI centuries, for example, Rafaellino del Garbo remembered this. Maybe he’s not the only one. It would be interesting to collect other ancient images of the seals and inscriptions on the tomb of Jesus who rose from the dead.

The meaning of the second line is also absolutely clear. Recall that “Fish” is one of the most common symbols of Christ. It turns out that Christ (by his Resurrection) “tormented” the night watch at His tomb, led the guards into excitement, into horror. Or, the “Tormented Fish”, that is, the Christ who suffered and rose from the dead, frightened, led the night guard around the tomb into excitement.

No Rest for the Wicked…LOL :o)

Bite Size Chunks is all I’m allowed lately.

I started at 6am and I’ve just gone back to the beginning of my formulating hypothesis, theory, doobery whatnot.

I’m NOT up on the Shakespeare Sonnets. A part of his works that I’ve neglected for a long time. But I was sent back to them at stupid o’clock this morning. Also to something that I’d read a couple of days ago…see quote below :

Please note that all researchers of the “Shakespearean question”, including I.M.Gililov, are absolutely convinced of the stability and correctness of the general picture of the events of the 16th-17th centuries, drawn to us today by Scaligerian textbooks. They think that the mysteries surrounding the identity of the Great Bard concern only him, and are built into the generally reliable history of the 16th and 17th centuries. But they do not understand that in reality the entire historical building of the 16th-17th centuries is very shaky and needs to be substantially rebuilt. Moreover, starting from the foundation! For example, for Shakespeare scholars, trained in Scaligerian history from childhood, the identity of Queen Elizabeth does not raise any doubts. There was, they say, such a real famous queen on the island of England. But after all, we already understand that the “English Elizabeth” is, basically, a phantom reflection of the Russian-Horde queen Sophia Paleolog. And that a significant part of the “English island events” actually unfolded in a completely different place – in the metropolis of the Great Empire, in Russia-Horde. The same should be said, for example, about Henry VIII, see chapter 5. And about Catherine of Aragon. And about Mary Stuart…

As we have shown in this book,

Shakespeare’s works are even more important and interesting than is commonly believed. 

That is, their high assessment adopted today should be strengthened. After all, many of his texts turn out to be not just plays on “very ancient themes”, but in fact – chronicles of the formation and development of the Great = “Mongolian” Empire. For example, the poet talks about Andronicus-Christ (calling him Hamlet), Judas Iscariot (Timon of Athens), the Virgin Mary, John the Baptist, King Herod (Macbeth), Queen Herodias, Sophia Paleologus (Cordelia and Catherine of Aragon), Ivan the Terrible (Henry VIII ), stories of Esther (Anne Boleyn)… Shakespeare scholars did not even suspect this, since the true essence of some of the poet’s fundamental works was distorted by later layers.

****

They have a point, NC. We are all so conditioned to fit our theories around the “SOLIDITY” of the History that we’ve been taught.

Did the likes of Scaliger know, when he was first commissioned to rewrite HIS- story, that he was creating a HYDRA that would grow a million heads throughout the decades and centuries without him?

Was that the plan?

To fiddle with the compass bearings and just sit back and watch the chaos of their descendants’ travels?

I so badly want to debunk the theory that Rutland and Elizabeth Sidney were the man we call Shakespeare but… I have so much more work to do :o)

Meanwhile – whomever wrote the words – here is something beautiful.

Commodus

I made him watch this last weekend.

He did the expected unexpected : What? I thought that bloke was made up by Hollywood.

The sad thing is that there are places where I can NEVER go with those in this, my real, ordinary, daily life.

Commodus WAS real. But not the “Real” that we’ve been taught…maybe (?)

****

NC :

As we have already said, the biography of Andronicus-Christ was reflected in four “ancient” biographies of the following Roman emperors at once: Aelius Hadrian, Elia Vera-the “father”, Elia Vera-the “son” and, finally, Commodus. Let’s start with the first three, since the biography of Commodus deserves a separate study and we will devote a special chapter to it. But the “biographies” of Aelius Adrian and the “two Aelius Faiths” are strongly intertwined and quite similar. Therefore, we will consider them together as a single text relating to Andronicus-Christ.

****

Side Note : I’ve done Aelius Adrian before. He may be connected with a wall and Scotland !

The MYTH of Commodus makes sense when you’ve read The Annals of Niketas Choniates.

Whomever he was – this writer HATED every single thing about Andronicus I Comnenus. No insult or abomination by this Emperor was too extreme for Choniates’ History of Byzantium.

Back to Commodus – whom we all know quite well now via Gladiator…SMH.

Back With The Blood Countess : For the Millionth Time!

No offence intended to Dr. Kat.

The fact that I watch her means that I have respect for her knowledge of our “history.”

But – there are certain subjects that totally get my Dander Up!

 Erzsébet  Báthori is one of them. She is, to me, in the same MS History mould as Vlad the Impaler aka Dracula.

I’ve posted about both Beth and Drac many, many times. I’ve posted MY research into their backgrounds and the links, hinted at by others better than me, that I’ve made.

In my humble opinion both Elizabeth and Vlad are the best known subjects of the 17th century re-write of History – that OLD CIVILISATION that once existed and whose name I will not type because it’s been so bastardised by so many.

To take a slight diversion – I’m also an armchair psychologist and Psychic Vampires are another favourite subject. Blood is energy. Sucking either is theft/bodily intrusion and WRONGWRONGWRONG.

Wrong.

Check out the althist of dragons? Or heraldry? Or Bram Stoker’s sources? Or the Basarab? Or Gary Oldman?

? ? ?

Oh. Yes. Immortal Beloved……aka A New Vampire like Lucy Westenra.

I’m ranting. Again. Ooops :o)

Kampe/Campe : Guardian of TARTARUS

NC :

THE WAR LASTED FOR TEN YEARS, UNTIL GAYA-EARTH FORECASTED VICTORY TO HER GRANDSON ZEUS ON THE CONDITION THAT HE WOULD TAKE THOSE ALLIES, WHOM THE CROWN SHARPENED IN TARTARUS. Therefore, he secretly went to Kampa, the aged guardian of Tartarus, killed her and, taking the keys, FREED THE CYCLOPES AND THE Hundreds of Hands … For this, the CYCLOPES HANDED ZEUS A LIGHTNING WEAPON AS A WEAPONS OF ATTACK, HADES GIVED HIM A HELMET THAT MAKES HIM INVISIBLE, AND POSEIDON THE TRIDENT. When the military council of the three brothers ended, Hades quietly entered the abode of Cronus to steal his weapons, and while Poseidon brandished his trident and distracted Cronus’s attention, ZEUS SHOCKED HIM WITH LIGHTNING. THEN THREE HUNDRED ARMS SEIZED STONES AND STARTED THROWING WITH THEM THE REMAINING TITANS, who turned in disorderly flight after the UNEXPECTED SCREAM OF THE GOAT-LEGS PAN. The gods rushed to pursue them. Cronus and all the defeated Titans, except Atlantis, were expelled TO THE WEST OF THE BRITISH ISLANDS (others, however, say that they were imprisoned in Tartarus) and left under the protection of the hundred-armed.

****

We can go back to Vulcan and the Anvil that took 9 dyas to descend into Tartarus. Or – we can move forward to K/CAMPE the F1RST Guardian of Tartarus.

D’yall see where this has gone?

O, What a Tangled Web etc

Apparently (yt confirmed) we are now in the year 1022.

SMH and sob :o(

The 6 to 8 Wives of Ivan the Terrible

I see Ivan Grozny as more Weak than Terrible. He went back and forth between two women but History says different. See video below.

About 5 years ago I just HAD to debunk the New Chronology claims about Shakespeare’s plays. I started with Macbeth…Out, Out Damn Spot.

By the time I got to Henry VIII I was feeling slightly less cocky about MY knowledge of the Bard’s works.

****

Katherine of Aragon or is that Zoë?

Wednesday, 12 June 2019, 9:40

Oh, yes. I was here…with Shakespeare and Henry VIII and the women.

We are back with the four!!

Katherine of Aragon

“Sir, I desire you do me right and justice; 
And to bestow your pity on me: for 
I am a most poor woman, and a stranger, 
Born out of your dominions; having here 
No judge indifferent, nor no more assurance 
Of equal friendship and proceeding. Alas, sir, 
In what have I offended you? what cause 
Hath my behaviour given to your displeasure, 
That thus you should proceed to put me off, 
And take your good grace from me?”

I won’t go into her story. It is too well-known and/or too easy to research.

She is the good woman in Henry VIII.

Zoë Palaiologina

Destruction of Zoë Palaiologina’s grave – Kremlin, Moscow 1929

Who was Zoë Palaiologina? Otherwise known as Sophia Palaiologina.

She was the daughter of Thomas Palaiologos, Despot of Morea…

Flag of Morea

Am I getting boring now? :o)

She married Ivan III/Ivan IV the Terrible etc etc. See previous posts. And he exchanged her for a younger model.

Zoë was a true Lady of Tartary. The Hordian Princess. She and Ivan ruled over the entire Empire in the 15th century.

She/her story is also reflected in other historical figures besides Katherine of Aragon.

Elizabeth I Tudor and Catherine de Medici.

Sarajevo

Both Himself and my brother spent time in Sarajevo. They both say the same about this city and also the surrounding area…

…Stunningly Beautiful.

Such a shame that history has given it a bad rep. I’d love to go there.

Uurm – TAXI ? ? ?

P.S. Don’t y’all just love BOT (bloody ‘orrible torture) read videos? ;o))

N.C. Perspective :

In addition, being in constant motion, the regular army was supposed to be located near the warehouses of food, ammunition, and weapons. Consequently, a system of military warehouses should have existed on the territory of Russia. The warehouse is also called by another Russian word – SARAY. It is clear that the military leaders – the khans should have had their rates, basically, not somewhere, but precisely near these warehouse-sheds. And what do we see? In the history of the “Tatar-Mongol Golden Horde” we constantly meet the mention of Sarai. There are many cities in Russia with the roots of the SAR, and especially on the Volga. Indeed: SARATOV, SARansk, ChebokSARy, TSARitsyn = SAR + Tsyn, ZARaysk in the Ryazan region is an episcopal city, ZARansk in Western Russia. Note that all of these are large and largest cities. Including, some of them are the capitals of autonomous entities. SAR can also be a variant of KING.

In the Balkans, by the way, there is the famous city of Sarajevo, that is, SARAY. We see a noticeable spread of the name “barn” on the territory of Russia and medieval Turkey.

There’s A Silver Lining Somewhere – I Can Feel It!

Ms TikTok has done ME, personally, more good than she will EVER know…see video below.

Way back : 99.9999% of this world had never heard of New Chronology or Fomenko and Team. Now – all of a sudden – people are waking up and saying WTF? What just happened?

I’ve a funny feeling that my past 3 years of abuse and bans on the yt “Truth” Community came from a deep human desire for instant gratification…and Money.

Why spend almost half a lifetime studying a subject when y’all can invent history and have the instant delightful gratification of watching everyone else copy you?

New Chronology was always seen as so far outside of left field that it did not actually exist. Ergo : totally unprofitable and time-wasting.

The Most Hated on that yt platform today are those who can back up their research with so much that they “deserve to be hated.”

I have a screenshot of the original comment made on a live chat yesterday. She said that she loved everyone – even those that deserve to be hated.

Nice (?)

Welcome to this Brave New World where B.S, disrespect, insults, lies, deceptions and being a total twat can make you RICH & POWERFUL :o)

I’ll stay here, by myself, poor and happy. FACT!

Laugh.

Deeply Uncomfortable Life Path

From day 1 on ytoob I presented my work with the New Chronology narrative to Martin Liedtke. He very kindly shared this with his subs and other friends.

This was 3 years and 5 days ago.

To this date (10/1/2020) Fomenko and his team’s work has been at the very core of The Hidden History Project. I applied every single element of my former Police Investigative training to my studies of this – as if I was interrogating a suspect or questioning a witness…again.

Sadly : 3 years and 5 days ago, I was seen as a crazy crank who had thrown something new into the arena that titillated a few, for a minute or two. And then they rejected me and my work.

Life has moved on and suddenly many are asking about New Chronology. Not from me. From those who rejected the premise back then.

Here is the only place open to me now. Here is where I had to start again after a total totalling of everything.

I’m so grateful to those who follow me and like some of my posts. As YOU know – it’s not just crazy crank history here. There is so much more.

Bless you all for making my uncomfortable worth every second of my pain xxx

Historical Timelines : A Moveable Feast

From NC :

# We warn the reader that the ancient and medieval history known to us today, including the Russian one, is far from self-evident, very confusing and unstable. In general, the history of the pre-press era earlier than the 15th-16th centuries is by no means a story based on genuine ancient documents and unambiguously following from them. On the contrary, the version of history before the 16th-17th centuries was the result of the special work of several generations of historians and chronologists who tried to reconstruct the picture of the past. However, the resulting picture is by no means indisputable. At the same time, most of us, brought up in the school history course, are convinced that the restoration of past events is, in principle, a simple matter. It is enough, they say, to take the chronicle, read it and retell it in modern language. And difficulties can arise supposedly only when specifying small details. Alas, this is not the case.

# The story we know today is a WRITTEN story, that is, based mainly on written documents. All of them have gone through a long series of edits, alterations, compilations. Of course, something is written on the stones, but these grains acquire meaning ONLY AFTER THE MAIN HISTORY BUILDING IS ALREADY BUILT ON THE BASIS OF THE CHRONICLES.

When we say that Brutus killed Caesar with a blow of the sword, it only means that it is written in some written source that has come down to us. Nothing more! The question of how accurately the document reflected real events is very complicated and needs special research. It refers, rather, to the philosophy of history, and not to written history as such.

The reader usually thinks that today we have a chronicle written by the contemporaries of Genghis Khan and eyewitnesses of the events. This is not true. Today, most often we have only a very late version, created several hundred years after the events.

Certainly, the written documents were based on some kind of reality. But one and the same event could be reflected in many written documents. And in significantly different ways. Sometimes it is so different that at first glance it is impossible to believe that we are faced with two different descriptions of the same event. Therefore, when the reader sees in our book a phrase like: “such and such a historical figure is a duplicate or a reflection of another character”, this does not mean at all that one REAL person in the past was a reflection = a duplicate of another REAL person. This would, of course, be nonsense.

It is about something else. Namely, that in our “history textbook” one and the same real person, for example Genghis Khan, can be represented SEVERAL TIMES. Under different names and even referred to different eras! However, his real personality “multiplied” only on paper, and not in reality. The question of when and where he actually lived is rather difficult. No less difficult is the question – “what was his real name”. In ancient times, people often had many nicknames. In addition, getting on the pages of the chronicles, they sometimes acquired new “names”, nicknames, by which their contemporaries never knew. This could be the result of errors, confusion, translations of texts from language to language. In our work, we do not set the task of finding out the “true names” this or that hero. That is, as his contemporaries called him.

# Studying written history, you need to constantly remember that WORDS, NAMES, GEOGRAPHICAL NAMES COULD CHANGE THEIR MEANING WITH TIME. One and the same word could mean completely different things in different eras. A striking example of this is the word “Mongolia”, which we will talk about a lot below. In addition, MANY GEOGRAPHICAL NAMES ARE MOVED ON THE MAP over the centuries. Geographical maps and names on them froze, basically, only with the beginning of printing, when it became possible to print and distribute many identical copies of the same map for practical purposes of navigation, education, etc. Before that, each card was unique. A motley discord reigned in them.

Characters, which today are usually called “antique”, are often present on medieval maps and paintings as medieval heroes. Historians themselves note this striking circumstance: “ANTIQUE characters appear on the cards in the clothes of MEDIEVAL burghers and knights” [953], p.21.

In ancient texts, names and names were often used without vowels, that is, WITHOUT VOICES – only in the form of a skeleton of consonants. In the past, vowels were sometimes added from memory when reading a text. This is especially evident in the Arabic languages, where almost all vowels were added from memory and to some extent arbitrarily. But since in the Middle Ages, Arabic writing was used not only for Arabic, but also for some other languages, then in them the vowels in writing were forgotten. Even if in this spoken language itself they were stable. To the greatest extent, this, of course, applied to proper names.

Naturally, over time, the vowels got confused, forgotten, replaced by others. The consonants written down on paper were more stable. For example, many older texts speak of the Greek Faith. But it is possible that the word Greece is just a slightly distorted pronunciation of the name Horus or Horus, that is, CHRIST. In this case, GREEK FAITH is simply CHRISTIAN FAITH.

Of course, Russian history is closely intertwined with world history. Any shifts in chronology, movements in geography related to Russian history, inevitably lead to similar problems in the history of other countries. The reader will have to abandon the opinion that the old history of other states rests on an unshakable foundation. It turns out that chronological and geographical problems in the history of Rome, Byzantium, Italy, Egypt, etc. do exist. They are even much more serious than in Russian history. See the first three books of the seven-volume Chronology.

# Of particular interest to us, naturally, is the history of ancient Russia, the Russian Empire and neighboring states. The history of our country is one of the basic foundations in the foundation of world civilization, therefore, the key moments of our history should be carefully checked. Today we know very well how often historical facts have been distorted and distorted for the sake of one or another momentary trend. In the first three books of the seven-volume “Chronology” we have demonstrated how often such distortions congealed in the form of irrefutable truths, which then passed from textbook to textbook. And it takes a lot of work to “knock down the later plaster” and reveal the true picture of events.

Distortions are unacceptable in the history of any state. But distortions of Russian history acquire a special resonance for us. Therefore, here the investigation must be absolutely clear and impartial. No authority here can be authority. Why are we saying all this now?

It turns out that the chronology of Russian history adopted today is not free from serious contradictions. They were first pointed out by Nikolai Aleksandrovich Morozov [547]. However, as our analysis showed, even he did not fully realize the scale of the problem.

Many historians today consider Russian history to be among the so-called “young” ones. They mean comparison with “old cultures” – with Rome, Greece, Egypt, etc. However, as we have shown in the first three books of the seven-volume “Chronology”, all these “old chronologies” need to be substantially shortened. “Ancient” cultures need to be moved to the era of the XI-XVII centuries AD. The history of the 11th-13th centuries known to us today is the result of the overlap, “summation” of the true events of this era – very dimly lit by the surviving documents – and reflections of events from the more intense era of the 13th-17th centuries. Of course, we do not mean here the saturation with events in general, but the saturation with those events about which some information has come down to our time.

It is believed that the main Russian written history begins in the 9th-10th centuries A.D. From the experience we have already accumulated, one should expect that a chronological shift may be detected in it and that some of the events will have to be moved upward, postponed for several hundred years, to the era of the XIV-XVII centuries. And this expectation is justified. We have indeed found such a shift of 400 years. First, it was discovered by AT Fomenko in the statistical analysis of the functions of volumes of Russian chronicles, see “Changing the dates – everything changes”, Ch. 3: 1. We later found the same shift in an independent way in the study of dynastic parallelisms, see below.

# Sometimes we note linguistic parallels and unexpected consonances of ancient names and names found in the annals. Let us emphasize that such parallels are by no means proof of anything. We present them only to demonstrate the possibility of significantly different readings of uncoordinated old texts. However, in many cases they are well explained by our reconstruction.

Now we will briefly outline the main problems and propose our new concept of Russian chronology, radically different from the Millerian-Romanov version, as well as from the idea of ​​N.A. Morozov [547].

BrainBusting Chronology

For time to time I may get a little antsy about the simplicity of adding an i or a j to a date and claiming that y’all “know” about the manipulation of historical timelines.

I’m sorry but it is far more complicated than that.

It took me a long time to get my working brain cell around Andreu Marfull Pujadas X-185. Of course – I had to test it for myself. Especially as I’d written a novel set in the early 17th century and needed to cope with the fact that what may have happened then also MAY have happened well over a century later.

What is X-185 based on?

It is based on the date 1185 when Andronicus I Comnenus was crucified. There was a solar eclipse in May that year and the world went dark.

Two major historical events can be re-calculated by the 185 doubled to 370. These are the Destruction Myths of the Cathars and the Knight’s Templars.

Anyway : Over to AMP’s X-185 Hypothesis about the Conquest of America.

Chronology X-185: Another mind map for the discovery of America

Andreu Marfull Pujadas
October 5, 2019

According to the New Chronology of Fomenko and Nosovskiy , the European colonization of America, as we know it, began in the second half of the seventeenth century, and before that routes were established between Europe and America by the Atlantic Ocean, where Jews, Christians and Muslims take part. Multiple and extraordinary tests corroborate this. From the same, this research shows, without any doubt, that the ancient history and the chronicle of the sacred texts refer to events that took place during the Middle Ages.

Otherwise, according to Chronology X-185 , the feat of the discoverer Columbus is linked to the dismantling of the Order of the Temple of Solomon, and at the same time there is an additional chronological leap that makes sense. The Middle Ages must be understood 185 years closer, and the events of the Order of the Temple of Solomon must be understood 185 years later, until the gates of the eighteenth century. The sixteenth and seventeenth centuries of Hispanic Habsburgs did not exist.

According to the logic, evidence and evidence of this research, there is a Jewish, Solomonic and Templar order in the real Middle Ages, which coexists with a Christian and Mohammedan order, but with a different chronological setting. to the officer. The Order of the Temple of Solomon has its temporal space 370 years closer, so that its foundation and its dismantling, by the king of France, does not take place in the years 1116 and 1307 officials, but in the years 1486 and 1677 reals. In turn, the discovery of Columbus must be placed 185 years later, also in 1677. Initially, the Spanish papal colonial project is a consequence of the French challenge to this Order. Until then, the Order has led maritime routes around the world, in relative peace with the Ottoman Mohammedans, the result of a pact between East and West. The Covenant is the covenant of Solomon’s Ark, established in the fifteenth century, according to the New Chronology of Fomenko and Nosovskiy and according to the Chronology X-185. But the covenant went into crisis in the seventeenth century, and in response, the power of the Vatican was born, and with it the messianic project of Christ that would eventually drive the colonization and comprehensive reconstruction of history and sacred texts, with the direction of the company of Jesus and the censor arm of the Holy Inquisition.

As a result of a symbolic challenge associated with the imposition of a Messiah, which must replace the ideal of the Temple of Solomon, a comprehensive manipulation of history begins. With it, a false origin of colonization is created, which in turn mutilates the real story of the protagonists who have led it until then. This great manipulation began to be intensive in 1715, which corresponds to the official year of 1530.

This reconstruction creates great inconsistencies, such as the now recognized evidence of the existence of previous routes to America, established by the Nordic peoples, as well as the equivalents from Greater China. But there are others that can be analyzed. On the one hand, there are the maps and the extraordinary pictorial imagery that is associated with the caravels of the oceans with the red cross, which has survived its erasure and destruction. Multiple images identify the discovery of Columbus with the kicked cross of the Order of the Temple of Solomon, and some world maps show the presence of an equivalent dominant fleet across all oceans. All of them refer to the Order of the Temple of Solomon. On the other hand, there are numerous maps of the time with the Catalan-Aragonese emblems and the cross of the Portuguese Order of Christ (this order officially directs the first decades of the Portuguese colonial enterprise), which usually do not include the symbol of the representative castle of Castile. These maps speak of an order prior to Spanish, in the colonial enterprise. But there are also other inconsistencies, such as the colonial, papal project of the Treaty of Tordesillas of 1494 (the year 1679 real), which divides the world between the kings of Aragon and Castile and those of Portugal. This international treaty is illogical, as is the historical anachronism of the official splitting of a new continent while Columbus believes he is in Asia. Otherwise, the surprising concessions to Admiral Columbus are not congruent officially, the first decades of the Portuguese colonial enterprise), which usually do not include the symbol of the representative castle of Castile. These maps speak of an order prior to Spanish, in the colonial enterprise. But there are also other inconsistencies, such as the colonial, papal project of the Treaty of Tordesillas of 1494 (the year 1679 real), which divides the world between the kings of Aragon and Castile and those of Portugal. This international treaty is illogical, as is the historical anachronism of the official splitting of a new continent while Columbus believes he is in Asia. Otherwise, the surprising concessions to Admiral Columbus are not congruent officially, the first decades of the Portuguese colonial enterprise), which usually do not include the symbol of the representative castle of Castile. These maps speak of an order prior to Spanish, in the colonial enterprise. But there are also other inconsistencies, such as the colonial, papal project of the Treaty of Tordesillas of 1494 (the year 1679 real), which divides the world between the kings of Aragon and Castile and those of Portugal. This international treaty is illogical, as is the historical anachronism of the official splitting of a new continent while Columbus believes he is in Asia. Otherwise, the surprising concessions to Admiral Columbus are not congruent These maps speak of an order prior to Spanish, in the colonial enterprise. But there are also other inconsistencies, such as the colonial, papal project of the Treaty of Tordesillas of 1494 (the year 1679 real), which divides the world between the kings of Aragon and Castile and those of Portugal. This international treaty is illogical, as is the historical anachronism of the official splitting of a new continent while Columbus believes he is in Asia. Otherwise, the surprising concessions to Admiral Columbus are not congruent These maps speak of an order prior to Spanish, in the colonial enterprise. But there are also other inconsistencies, such as the colonial, papal project of the Treaty of Tordesillas of 1494 (the year 1679 real), which divides the world between the kings of Aragon and Castile and those of Portugal. This international treaty is illogical, as is the historical anachronism of the official splitting of a new continent while Columbus believes he is in Asia. Otherwise, the surprising concessions to Admiral Columbus are not congruent This international treaty is illogical, as is the historical anachronism of the official splitting of a new continent while Columbus believes he is in Asia. Otherwise, the surprising concessions to Admiral Columbus are not congruentCapitulations of the Santa Fe , sealed in Barcelona before consummating the “discovery”. These capitulations do not make sense, and neither does the division of the world between the Hispanic kings of Spain and Portugal, in the way it has been transmitted to us. It makes no sense to delegate to the lineage of a supposed discoverer the rank of Viceroy of Asia (life charge for him and his successors) and send him there with only three ships to take possession of the lands, before the magnificent authority of the Great Khan; nor that he be given the right of tithe which hitherto belongs to the church; nor to be made the chief judge of all matters settled there.

It makes no sense to divide the world between the lineage of an admiral, in the service of a Castilian queen, and the authority of Portugal led by the Order of Christ. Nor does it make sense for this Pope-granted undertaking, which is to benefit all Christians, to exclude those from the rest of Europe and Hispanic Jews and Muslims who have lived there for centuries, to the point of declaring them all. unworthy to exercise his right of adoption of faith in the same God, from the same year 1492. He does not have it.

On the other hand, it does make sense for Columbus to represent the Genoese and / or Catalan authority of the Order of the Temple of Solomon (which to date has been the main maritime authority of the military arm, as evidenced by the paintings in the discovery and the world maps), after the assassination of the King of France on this Order in the Frankish and Occitan lands in the real year 1677 (the official 1307), coinciding with the weakening of the alliance of Solomon’s Ark . In this sense, the foundation of the Templar powers in the kingdoms of Valencia and Portugal, with the names of the Order of Santa Maria de Montesa and of Christ, respectively, in the official year 1314, which is the royal 1684, acquires special relevance. These orders have been created alongside the Treaty of Tordesillas, and have been empowered by the Pope to complete the mission of the defeated Temple of Solomon. in the name of Mary and Christ, under the new cross of St. George. That is, at the beginning of the reconstruction of history, the integral mutation of the Order of the Temple of Solomon is conceived under the authority of the Pope of Rome, challenging the boldness of the King of France.

According to this reasoning, it makes sense for Columbus to be the head of an imperial lineage associated with the great monarchs, which in turn represents and / or replaces the Jewish authority of Western Europe and a Roman religious and military order. and Solomonic, dominant and main, before its subsequent dismantling which gives rise to the new Catholic and Roman order of the Vatican. Along with the powers of the Columbus, the Borjas appear in the Hispanic and Vatican spheres, going hand in hand, and, in turn, as they are intervened by the European imperial competition that rises with them, they “fall” more years. late, together.

At stake is the economic foundation of an ambitious Christianized project, which needs gold and silver from America, which until then has enriched the Order of the Temple of Solomon. The appropriation of this “treasure” of metal and precious stone mines by European Christianity, without which it is impossible to conceive of European colonization, is a compelling reason to erase from history, forever more, the authority of its former owners. Especially the Jew and the Mohammedan, hitherto allied in a fragile but fruitful Solomonic order, wise.

For this reason, Pope Innocent VIII gives Miguel Alonso de Pinzón, before the deed of discovery, a document from the Court of Solomon from the Jewish estate that informs how to get to large and rich lands that are in the ‘West, pointing to Mexico. The Court exists, and in this beginning it is Jewish and papal.

In turn, the significance of this reconstruction goes beyond the scope and meaning that emerges in the first instance. It has to do with the deliberate erasure of the importance of the Roman Empire in Constantinople in favor of that of Italy, which is largely an invention created especially during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. And it has to do with the transfer of papal powers to Rome, from Avignon; with the story of the erasure of the medieval authority of the Temple of Solomon; and with the stigmatization and subsequent persecution of the Jewish and Mohammedan communities.

According to the reconstruction of Chronology X-185, papal Rome is basically a work born in Avignon, not before, and is created for the glory of Europe and as a construct tailored to the requirements of the colonial project, Catholic and universal, which has since changed history, making Rome the first seat of the history of the Christian church. He began his epic from there, for the glory of the popes and Christianity, defeating, by the strength of faith, a pagan empire. It is the beginning of large-scale archaeological, genealogical and documentary falsification.

The Italian Rome, the Vatican and the Messianic Christ then prevailed, under the relentless arm of the colonial project and with the ecclesiastical arms of the Holy Inquisition and the Society of Jesus.

For this reason, it is then, throughout the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, that the differences between Christians and the Mohammedan and Jewish peoples are radicalized, not before. As Fomenko and Nosovskiy do, in fact.

Continuing with the thread of historical reconstruction:

  • The official year 1520 corresponds to the real year 1705, and coincides with four major episodes: 1) with the stage prior to the fall of the seat of Rhodes of the Order of St. John, heir to the Order of the Temple of Solomon: 2) with the beginning of the European struggle for control of Rome, Italy and the Crown of Spain; 3) with the taking of possession of Mexico, by Cortes (who would be the Count of Ribagorça and Cortes, of Byzantine imperial blood, of the lineage of the Comnè Lascaris, the leaders of the Constantine Order and St. George); and 4) with the beginning of the so-called Christian Schism of the West, which begins in 1520 (1705) with the work The Captivity of Babylon , written by Martin Luther.
  • The official year 1540 corresponds to the real year 1725, and coincides with the founding of the Society of Jesus, which in a few decades directs the reconstruction of history with the collaboration of the main imperial headquarters in Europe. North Africa, the Middle East, Persia, India, China, Japan and America. This production fills the imaginary of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries with history books, all of them books published since then but with dates sent to the past.
  • In 1725 the Treaty of Vienna was agreed, ending decades of struggles throughout Europe. The agreements become a global pact that legitimizes the distribution of half the world between the recently recreated European states. The Society of Jesus was then created, not before, and its main purpose was to spread the Messianic Bible and reconstruct history by reconciling all the calendars of the world.

This is the beginning of the greatest coordinated manipulation ever agreed upon between the powers of the world, after decades of timid advances already begun, until the creation of the first global chronological map that has just been established. Annio de Viterbo (in the real year 1683, that is to say the official 1498), later Isaac Newton (the official year, and real, of 1727) and later the Company of Jesus (1725-1773), with the collaboration of the imperial and priestly courts around the world, they reconstruct the past and deliver to the academy of history the official narrative that no one dares to question. This way:

  • The official year 1583 corresponds to the real year 1768, and is when the main publication of the current official chronological map, by Joseph Justus Scaliger, takes place, after intense decades of work. It coincides with the dismantling of the Society of Jesus in almost all of Europe and with its official suppression by Pope Clement XIV in 1773. In this way, the trace of all this great and extraordinary manipulation is erased.

It has a lot to do with this issue, which needs to be understood. It has to do with the sacred texts, with the Temple of Solomon, with the Jewish people and with everything that is transformed in the name of colonization, with facts that are entirely within the imaginary of the Middle Ages. It has to do with the roots of Freemasonry (1717-1736); with the independence of the United States of America (1776); with the French Revolution (1789); and with the later Napoleonic Empire (1804-1815). And at the same time, it has to do with the manipulation of the history of European colonial empires.

This reconstruction places the history of the colonial empires of Castile, Portugal, England and France on the list of modern stories recreated for their glory, especially in relation to the events of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. And, on the other hand, it places the previous history of powers such as Catalan, Genoese and Venetian on the list of adulterated stories, erased for the benefit of the previous ones.

Due to the geopolitical change that settled the Bourbons on the throne of Spain, a complete erasure of recent history is created that includes the total manipulation of the identity and reasons of the colonial enterprise of Christopher Columbus, as well as that of Hernán Cortés and that of other contemporary conquerors; with a systematic (unofficial) mutation of the Catalan lineages, which adopt a Castilian and Italian denomination.

The Castilian supremacy, which official history creates from the sixteenth century, in front of a Crown of Aragon that is molded to it, is the result of a bad chronological reconstruction ordered by the Roman Inquisitorial Church. In this deliberate manipulation, Catalan disappears from the published works; all the great conquerors are Castilians and there is no reason for such an offense (as in the eighteenth century), in an absurd scenario that coincides with a European Habsburg empire that colonizing Castilianism completely ignores. In fact, there was a Castilianization of Spain in the time of the Bourbons, in the eighteenth century, when the Catalans were subdued and the powers of the Hispanic kingdoms over Italy and the rest of Europe disappeared. The Castilian Spanish Empire begins then, and ends with the invasion of Napoleon and the consequent loss of most of the colonies, a century later. It is formerly a collective enterprise with a well-known Catalan and Italian presence, heir to the Temple of Solomon, which competes with France for control of Rome and that of the fractured Solomonic Empire.

The Golden Age of the Spanish (Spanish) language, in turn, did not begin in 1530, but in 1715, and did not end in 1645 but in 1830, when the Holy Inquisition fell in Spain. For this reason it has no Catalan reminiscence, neither in the language, nor in its authors, nor in its scenes. The cause is not the voluntary abandonment of the use of Catalan that tells the official story, after centuries of great prestige. It is the prohibition of its use imposed by the Decrees of Nueva Planta and the project of unifying all of Spain around a dominant Castilian language, both in the church and in the government, that the Royal Academy of the Languageestableix des de l’any 1712. La idea de crear un Segle d’Or de la literatura espanyola en català i altres llengües és incompatible amb el projecte institucional del seu esborrat, de la mateixa manera que es s’instaura a França amb el català , with the other Occitan variants and with the set of other languages ​​other than Parisian French.

For this reason, and not for another, Castilian zeal prevents the reconstruction of the Catalanness of the previous two centuries, creating what is, without a doubt, one of the greatest contradictions in Western European history. The Catalans, then settled in the middle of Italy and with numerous bridges with the papacy and with the commercial interests of all Europe, with a powerful bank and high positions in the Order of St. John the Baptist, do not voluntarily infringe the abandonment of this company. It is imposed on them by the new King and the new papal order.

It Was Always Going To Be a Challenge

I took the challenge. And spent quite a long time in disbelief until I could not disbelieve anymore.

This is what New Chronology is all about. It’s there for us to look into. It even (many times) encourages the reader to work by themselves and find other alternatives.

N.C. is NOT an absolute that it set in concrete. It flows with the time and evidence uncovered.

I have been a follower of AMP for several years now. His perspective is slanted towards Catalonia and the Catalan people…much as mine is towards the British Isles.

He gives a quick, concise summary of N.C. here :

The evidence and denial of the “New Chronology”

Andreu Marfull

The evidence and denial of the “New Chronology”

The story is structured around a chronology proposed in the seventeenth century, basically by the religious Joseph Justus Scaliger (1540-1609) and Dionysius Petavius ​​(1583-1652). It is especially from then on that history begins to be written in its entirety. In other words, most of the historiographical production has been built, for the most part, in the last four centuries.

Since then, almost all of the accumulated knowledge of history is based on a historical construct that is highly robust, in the face of the collective consciousness and the created interests that have been built on it, where the highest authority is the support. of the respective cultural institutions structured in each of the states where the respective official histories have been written. For this reason, questioning its validity is always a psychological challenge, and the approach to a new chronology is necessarily a process that requires time for analysis and reflection.

From the 16th century to the present day, different authors have questioned the official chronology, such as the mathematician, physicist, philosopher and theologian Isaac Newton (1642-1727), but for various reasons it has not been altered. Today, in the 21st century, several authors question its accuracy, but in general these are specific corrections. Of all of them, the “New Chronology” (hereinafter NC), directed by mathematicians Anatoly T. Fomenko and his collaborators, proposes a broader revision. Based on research work begun in the 1970s, he proposes to use the knowledge of modern astronomy and statistical mathematics to explore the chronological structure that governs global history up to the seventeenth century.

The NC presents an alternative chronology of history with a comprehensive reconstruction of the facts that are structured in it, which, in order to deepen its study and invite the international scientific community to join the project, is presented as a hypothesis theorized and verified experimentally with scientific methods.

Its results are especially questioned by the historiographical establishment, insofar as it concludes that the central axis of the official chronology is the result of a manipulation and of numerous accumulated errors, but its critic avoids the evidence of the data obtained. This research work shows that common dating systems have been structured around an erroneous chronology and that therefore the actual history is different from the official one.

For this reason, the NC has a clear vocation to open a debate that, by its nature, conflicts with the established historiographical authorities. Because of this, their results are the main object of resistance from the official community, which refuses to accept the logic of another story. Where Jesus is a myth built on the glory of a Roman emperor mercilessly condemned in the twelfth century; where the genealogies of the great medieval monarchies and emperors are an artificial recreation to legitimize their authority between the sixteenth and eighteenth centuries; and where the ancient history of ancient Egypt, Persia, Phenicia, Greece and Rome is a medieval reflection moved to time immemorial for the building of an accumulated power that came into conflict throughout the 15th, 16th and 17th centuries.

The way the official chronology has come to us would be a consequence of the difficulty in establishing the ideal of the Messiah under the figure of Christ, where the Krishna and the Buddha would be part of the same reflection, as well as the complex reality that leads the Ottomans to occupy Constantinople in 1453, to the Europeans to propose the colonization of the World and to China to complete its great wall in century XVI. Otherwise, its reading provides solid and coherent reasons for the raison d’être of the intense persecution of the Holy Inquisition in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries; of the international company of the Society of Jesus in the 16th-18th centuries; of the monarchical absolutism of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries; Napoleon’s interest in Egypt and the establishment of a new world empire after the success of the French Revolution;

To understand its raison d’être is only possible if it is first properly understood that the historical construct is based on a deception measured at a time in history when, for various reasons, it was considered appropriate to create new idols.

For this and other reasons, duly argued and demonstrable, the NC is not a common door to delve into the past, but it is interesting enough not to keep it closed. It provides great answers, and at the same time raises great questions, which are reached as a chain of logics that accumulate one after the other, like a piece of dominoes falling and dropping another that is just right. behind, and so on.

Disseminating it and collaborating with its study is an act of personal coherence, assumed from the moment the NC evidence is greater than the resistance (denial) that official history fosters.

Andreu Marfull, 2016

The NEW JERUSALEM Monastery : Russia

As the story goes…

Patriarch Nikon (7 May 1605 – 17 August 1681) had a whim to build a Holy Sepulchre close to Moscow. So he made someone trudge all the way to Jerusalem in the Middle East and spend a long time measuring every inch of the building there so that architects could recreate it back home.

EVEN THOUGH : In Florence, Italy there were already very detailed plans of the building.

Quote :

The question arises, where did the plan of the Jerusalem Church of the Holy Sepulchre come from – not to be confused with the Temple of Solomon! – published in Florence in 1626? And attributed today by historians to the XII century. 

It’s all very confusing.

Except for the fact that the “antiquitech” (?) on top still shows the Cross and the Crescent Moon.

Finally : I’ve Found a Researcher On MY Research Track

I came across Howdie via Owen Benjamin…today.

Thank you, BB :o)

I discovered The Holy Blood and The Holy Grail over 20 years ago too. Just after I’d really begun to deeply research the Cathars. Henry Lincoln brought us (the public) to Rennes-le-Chateau and all that. But it was always the Cathars who intrigued me most.

I’ve written about them several times and still research them today, despite outside objections by yt!

Coming from a New Chronology angle, I see this subject in a different light to many (most) others but there IS an undeniable link between the New Testament and the South of France. Everything goes back to the same source.

In MY research, the Mary who travelled to the South of France was Marie, the daughter of Andronicus I Comnenus. She first married the Lord of Montpellier and then the prince, later King of Aragon. Catalonia too is very connected here. The language, Occitan – the Langue d’Oc is of great importance.

This, in my opinion, is a subject well worth the time spent on looking into – PROPERLY. With an open mind and a willingness to see.

Greta Brookes – 18th of March 2019 : The Hidden History of the Cathars Part 1

For those who don’t know – Greta Brookes was my pen name when I used to earn a living wage from my writing in the pre- yt Babe’s Cathar expertise days. FACT!

Oh. What a Circus : Hagia Irina/Irene

New Chronology Quote :

Now let’s see where the altars of all these three temples are directed:

1) circus (generic Christianity of the XII-XIV centuries),

2) synagogue-basilicas (transitional era of the late XIV – early XV centuries),

3) the episcopal basilica (the era of apostolic Christianity of the 15th-17th centuries).

It turns out that:

1) the altar of the circus is located on the southeast side,

2) the altar of the synagogue-basilica is slightly turned from the southeast direction towards the purely east,

3) the altar of the episcopal basilica looks to the east, as it should be in contemporary Christian churches.

I live in the village Rectory which, until the early 1960’s, belonged to the Diocese of Lincoln. Our house fronts onto the back of the village church…which has it’s altar facing EAST. A fact that is provable every single day when the sun rises!

I talked a few days ago about the three temples in Constantinople. Hagia Irina/Irene…Why was a church built for a woman called Irene there?

Strangely )or not( the mother of Andronicus I Comnenus, who was the daughter of David the Builder of Georgia, was born Kata but re-named Irene/Irina when she married Isaac Comnenus.

****

Me quote :

COMNENUS,  THE HIDDEN HISTORY PROJECT

Family Tree – Comnenus

Monday, 4 March 2019, 11:18

I gave a preview yesterday and today I have done as much as is needed (just for now) on the Comnenus family tree.

{etc etc blah boring blah from me.}

Why is the altar of Hagia Irina facing south-east and why does it look like a colosseum there?

Is this very old church a prototype Aquatech building that they got bored with?

Who Knows? :o)

The “New Chronology” is crazier than you might think 🐻

Opinions are like arses – everybody has one!

Well. I may or MAY NOT have wasted a good proportion of the last 20 years of my life testing the CRAZY New Chronology “Pseudo – Science.”

MY OPINION IS :

I’ve gained more than I’ve lost. Time included :o)

I take their pseudo-whatnots and test them rigorously against my own, small, knowledge of history, hoping to find a boo-boo or several.

On New Year’s Eve 2018 I wrote the post below :

GRAND TARTARIA,  MY BLOODY BRAIN REALLY HURTS NOW!,  THE HIDDEN HISTORY PROJECT

The Many Hidden Mysteries of Grand Tataria.

Monday, 31 December 2018, 6:36

Have you heard of Grand Tartaria?

Did they teach you about this immense Empire at school?

Do you know where it was?

I’ve known about Tartaria/Tartary for quite a while now but it stayed on the outskirts of my research until about 6 months ago. Then all of a sudden, everywhere I look, I’m finding mentions of this Empire. It is being deeply investigated right now by many amazing researchers, from multiple angles.

So – where do I come in?

SIDE NOTE: 

For any of this information here to be understood, you HAVE to KNOW

that our whole history has been deliberately falsified.

This is a MAHOOSIVE area of study and the subject of future posts.

Well, right now, all I have is many, many questions and many many subjects that I’m linking together. And all that I can give you, at this moment in time is a list of my mixed up knowledge and the way it is slowly (but ever so brightly) linking together.

Not a lot of this will make sense right now. These are just clues. Signposts.

But, PLEASE bear with me over the coming months as I gather in more information.

Right. Let’s take a look at the first Very Rough Guide to  —

The Greta Brookes, Hidden History Project, Guide to Grand Tartaria. 

INTRODUCTION

  • Grand Tartaria existed but has been deliberately wiped from our knowledge.
  • Grand Tartaria was a HUGE, interlinked Empire that covered much of the known and unknown world.
  • Anything concerning Grand Tartaria is -today- reported by the mainstream ‘know-it-all’ establishment NEGATIVELY.
  • The structure of this society has been systematically erased over the last few centuries. On the ground as well as on paper.
  • What are the reasons for all the above?

A LONG LIST OF SEEMINGLY RANDOM THINGS THAT ARE ACTUALLY ALL INTERCONNECTED.

  • The truth about WHO WE REALLY ARE.
  • The truth about religion.
  • The truth about why our history has been put into the washing machine, cleaned, rinsed, spun about and then hung out on the line all shiny new, muddled up, and smelling sweeter (!)
  • Andronicus I Comnenus (killed in Constantinople)
  • Byzantine Empire
  • Crusades
  • Kievan Rus
  • Magnus Barefoot, King of Norway (killed in Ireland)
  • Harold Hardradr, King of Norway, Magnus Barefoot’s Grandfather (killed at Stamford Bridge in England)
  • Anne of Kiev.
  • Vladimir the Great and his wife.
  • Yaroslav the Wise
  • Elisiv, daughter of Yaroslav the Wise
  • St Magnus of Norway
  • Yaroslav Osmomysl of Galicia
  • Thrace
  • Phrygia
  • Paphlagonia
  • Anatolia
  • Kashka people
  • Aromanian
  • Romean
  • Vlachs
  • The Tsar of the Slavs
  • Margaret of Scotland
  • White Mummies found in Western China
  • The Fisher King and his wounded thigh
  • The Sack of Constantinople 1204
  • The Turin Shroud
  • The Mandylion
  • Constantinople=Jerusalem=Rome=Troy
  • The Haga Sophia/Temple of Solomon
  • Vlad the Impaler
  • Elisabeth Bathory
  • Red-haired, blue eyed people.
  • Trebizond
  • The Vatican
  • Great Fire of London
  • Romanov book 1648 “Book about Faith”
  • The Number of the BEAST 666
  • Birth by Cesarean Section
  • Pantera the Roman Soldier
  • The Comet, Solar Eclipse and Earthquake of 1185
  • Resets
  • Mud Floods
  • WHY, in Jean de Courcy’s Global Chronicle pictures are the FOUNDERS of TROY wearing WOOL LINED WINTER HATS WITH EAR FLAPS????

More to come…….

Happy New Year to ALL x

*****

In another post I wrote – If what I’m doing turns out to be a complete waste of time, no worries. I’ve had fun :o)

I’m still having fun. With Xenia Borisovna and a Prince of Denmark…but not Hamlet! Shame.

Mudflood vs Subsidence

This is not theory but a fact that can be determined by anyone who goes there and looks.

In Istanbul there are three Temples. The main and well-known Hagia Sophia, a much smaller Hagia Sophia and the Temple of St Irina.

The latter two temples are what is commonly known now as MUD-FLOODED. As in, there are levels below ground and a door that you enter by going DOWN some steps.

But the much larger Hagia Sophia is not MUD-FLOODED.

How did this happen in one city with three buildings quite close to each other?

Could it be that the Little Sophia and St Irina were early buildings that had not been constructed with enormous concrete foundations and time and circumstance has caused them to subside?

NC :

The first oddity is that there are no obvious traces of the immersion of the temple in the ground. The excavation made in front of him does not reach the walls of several meters, so it does not allow us to be sure whether the walls of Big Sophia have sunk into the ground. The temple is not dug around. The walls of Big Sophia are plastered, therefore it is difficult to say if there are traces of re-laying of windows and doors in order to raise them, as in other churches that have really sunk into the ground. In the same places where there is no plaster – and there are such places on the walls – no traces of re-laying due to immersion in the ground are noticeable. Why, by the way, was the plaster applied? For example, the one standing nearby – and more ancient! – Irina’s temple is not plastered. It is also not noticeable that in Bolshaya Sofia there were windows located too low or going into the ground.

And this is quite understandable. Old buildings are gradually sinking into the ground. Therefore, they have to be dug in so that the walls do not collapse, including due to dampness in the ground. In addition, doors, windows, etc. have to be repositioned and lifted. All these signs of antiquity are clearly visible both at Little Sophia and at the temple of Irina , fig . 1.14 , fig . 1.15 . Pay attention to the traces of the doors and windows of Irina’s temple that have sunk into the ground and therefore have been blocked. Those windows that are not laid are today already practically at ground level .

BTW : The Hagia Sophia is made of BRICKS. Erected sometime in the 16th century when building techniques were more advanced.

P.S. Istanbul has mad weather systems. Himself was there for 3 months, Jan, Feb, March and it either snowed or rained the whole time!

Gefahr für den Kölner Dom. Bild-Dokumentation zur Verwitterung…Cologne Cathedral

It’s German Engineering here. Must be GOOD!

I’d drive a BMW again any day of the week :o)

OK. SO – Cologne Cathedral has been much covered by yt Troothers and their amazing conclusions about architecture and dates and “facts.”

TARTARIAN BUILDINGS? Joke of the century, peeps! :o(

How about reading the conclusions of the writer of the above book analysed by some Russians ?

In fig. 1.55 we can see a schematic drawing from a technical brochure that demonstrates which parts of the cathedral are mediaeval, and which ones were built over the last two centuries. The full name of the brochure is Gefahr für den Kölner Dom. Bild-Doku-mentation zur Verwitterung. Auszug aus dem Kölner-Dom-Lese- und Bilderbuch. Professor Dr. Arnold Wolff. (The Dome of Cologne in danger. Graphic documents on weathering.) It was originally addressed to professionals specializing in the preservation and restoration of stone constructions. It was printed in Cologne, and can be obtained inside the cathedral.

According to the scheme, the oldest part of the masonry, that which belongs to the years 1248-1560, is represented by horizontal shading. The rest – shown by seven other kinds of shading, such as diagonal, dotted, etc. – was constructed a lot later, after 1826!

Amazingly enough, the oldest part of the masonry (horizontal shading) amounts to a small part of the modern edifice. Really, it only covers half of the cathedral’s foundation, and even this small mediaeval fragment is not whole, since it consists of two parts that are pretty distant from each other (q.v. fig. 1.55). The rest of the masonry – that is, the major part of the entire modern edifice – only appeared in the early XIX century. The absence of masonry dating to 1560-1825 is particularly suspicious. Does it mean that there were no works at all conducted in 250 years, or that they did not affect the structure of the cathedral in any way worthy of mentioning?

What the German historians and architects are telling us in this manner is that the cathedral that we see today had essentially been built in the XIX century! By what criteria does the Scaligerian history call it a mediaeval cathedral, in that case? Someone might say that despite the fact that the cathedral was built in the

XIX century, it should still faithfully represent the mediaeval original that had been standing there ever since the XIII century.

We would like to ask about the groundwork for this hypothesis. Are there any genuine mediaeval graphical representations of the Cologne Cathedral before the XVII century? Apparendy, there are none. The same brochure by Arnold Wolff contains an engraving dated 1834/1836 that depicts the cathedral very much the way it is nowadays. The album [1017] contains what appears to be the oldest picture of the cathedral on page 21 – dated 1809. We consider all of this to mean that the construction of the cathedral in its present form had only commenced in the XIX century, which is proved by the masonry scheme as shown above. The cathedral had been built between 1825 and 1835 for the most part, and the engraving dated 1834/1836 reflected the final stages of the cathedral’s construction. There were renovations done in the XIX-

XX century, but there were no major changes.

There were some traces of an ancient building on the site of the modern cathedral, since some mysterious masonry dated 1248-1560 is present on the scheme. However, this very scheme explicidy tells us that this mediaeval masonry had been used as building material for the XIX century construction. Let us study fig. 1.55 yet again. The lower part of the left tower is made of stones dating to the XIX century laced with layers dated from the XIII-XVI century. The upper part of this tower is a construction of the XIX century, and the same is true for the other tower. The old mediaeval building that stood on the place of the modern cathedral had been deconstructed in the XIX century, and its masonry was used as construction material when the new edifice was erected.

We would like to pose the following questions to the historians and the archaeologists:

1) Are there any genuine mediaeval pictures of either the Cologne cathedral or its predecessor that had existed before the XVII century?

2) Does the modern Cologne cathedral bear any resemblance to the mediaeval cathedral that stood on its place before the XVIII-XIX century? Our hypothesis is that if there had indeed been a cathedral here, it was significandy different from the modern one – a great deal smaller, for one thing.

3) Why are there no traces of masonry dating to the period between 1560 and 1825 in the walls of the modern Cologne cathedral? Doesn’t this mean that the construction really commenced in the XIX century on the spot that had been previously occupied by a building of smaller proportions belonging to the epoch of the XIII-XVI century? One should also question the veracity of dating the old masonry to the XIII-XVI century; these stones may well belong to the XVII-XVIII century. Another enquiry that we find worthy of making concerns the methods used by modern archaeologists for dating masonry fragments. How can they be certain that a given stone was used for the construction of a cathedral wall in the year that they consider to be the correct dating, and not some other?

We conclude with a general observation concerning the unnaturally prolonged construction of many historical buildings of mediaeval Europe. According to the Scaligerian history, they had been built very slowly indeed, for centuries on end. The Strasbourg cathedral is a perfect example. It used to be the tallest building in Europe. We are now being told that its construction began in 1015, and ended as late as 1275 ([415], Volume 1, page 333). That makes 260 years. The Erwin von Steinbach tower allegedly took 162 years to build. The historian Kohlrausch makes the logical conclusion that “the entire edifice [of the cathedral – A. F.] took 424 years to build” ([415], Volume 1, page 333) – almost half a millennium!

Kohlrausch also couldn’t have missed the unnaturally procrastinated construction of the Cologne cathedral. Apparently realizing the necessity of an explanation for such a great duration, he offers the following as a theory: “The Cologne cathedral, whose construction began… in 1248… lasted 250 years. Such tardiness can be explained by the fact that its stones bear a great amount of artwork” ([415], Volume 1, page 333). As we are beginning to understand, artwork has got absolutely nothing to do with the matter at hand – it is the erroneous Scaligerian chronology that has arbitrarily extended the construction period into several centuries.

Dmitry Alexandrovich Trifonov

Way to go :o)

DAT starts his book with these words…

The author of this work is not a professional historian, and, moreover, an orientalist-Tibetologist, but carried through his entire conscious life a keen interest in history and historical science, in general, an amateur historian, one might say – an amateur.

We vibe already. I’m exactly the same.

For those who are too lazy to read the books of the authors of NC or there is no time for it, I will briefly outline their main views on the historical chronology accepted by the official science.

According to AT Fomenko and AT Nosovsky, the chronology and history of the ancient and medieval world adopted today was finally created in the 16th century by European scholastic scholars Scaliger and Petavius ​​and contains major errors.

Many eminent scientists paid attention to the contradictions in the Scaligerian chronology practically from the moment of its “invention” and tried to explain them in one way or another. In particular, Professor of the Salamanca University de Arsilla, who lived in the 16th century (ie, a contemporary of the “founders” of the incorrect chronological concept of world history), I. Newton, Russian encyclopaedic scientist N.A. history of ancient Rome T. Mommsen and a number of others.

It really riles me when people disrespect Isaac Newton. Even way back in the 1600’s he was aware that there were nefarious shenanigans going on with historical chronology.

But I’m an amatoor without a degree, mortar board or certification.

M’eh :o)

Happy Saint Andrew’s Day.

I should be celebrating but today is extremely bittersweet for me.

It was also Nana Anne’s birthday. My boys always called their Great-Grandmother Nana Anne. Still do, in fact.

Enough with the moping and mithering…On to the history of Saint Andrew.

Dear Shaun, I beg to differ!

I can’t prove this but all my research suggests that “Saint” Andrew DID set foot in Scotland.

N.C. say that Andrew, The First Called, is also a very close match to Andronicus I Comnenus. As in – they may have been the same person. Wild speculation?

Not so wild when you know that Andrey Bogolyubsky, the Russian saint, is also a reflection of ANDROnicus.

Anyhoo – Sean says :